Dodge Jason Esli
Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Aug;29(8):653-63. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32550-6.
By determining, through self-report, Ontario gynaecologic surgeons' practices regarding surgical staging for epithelial ovarian cancer, this study aimed to quantify the gap between current practice and the ideal practice of surgical staging for ovarian cancer, as defined by the corresponding Canadian clinical practice guidelines.
All 711 active Ontario gynaecologic surgeons identified from the website of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario were confidentially surveyed by mail, using a structured questionnaire to explore individuals' surgical management of an adnexal mass suspicious for epithelial ovarian cancer, using a clinical case simulation. Specifically, gynaecologic surgeons' adherence to the CPGs was determined by self-report, and various physician characteristics were explored for potential associations with adherence to the CPGs in the clinical case simulation using the Fisher exact test.
The survey response rate was 69.8%. Only 44.3% of Ontario gynaecologic surgeons adhered to the CPGs in their responses to the clinical case simulation. Gynaecologic oncologists were more likely than non-oncologists to self-report surgical staging according to the CPGs during the clinical case simulation (P = 0.0004). Adherence was also significantly associated with practice at a university centre (P = 0.013) and practice at a centre with a gynaecologic oncologist (P = 0.001) but was not associated with surgical volume.
This study has confirmed that a significant gap exists between current practice and the ideal practice of surgical staging for epithelial ovarian cancer in Ontario, as defined by the corresponding Canadian CPGs. Further investigation will explore potential barriers to optimal practice to facilitate the development of a knowledge translation strategy to improve surgical staging for ovarian cancer in Ontario.
通过自我报告来确定安大略省妇科外科医生在上皮性卵巢癌手术分期方面的做法,本研究旨在量化当前做法与加拿大相应临床实践指南所定义的卵巢癌手术分期理想做法之间的差距。
从安大略省医师和外科医生学院网站上识别出的所有711名活跃的安大略省妇科外科医生,通过邮件进行保密调查,使用结构化问卷,通过临床病例模拟来探究个人对疑似上皮性卵巢癌附件包块的手术处理方式。具体而言,通过自我报告来确定妇科外科医生对临床实践指南的遵循情况,并使用Fisher精确检验在临床病例模拟中探究各种医生特征与遵循临床实践指南之间的潜在关联。
调查回复率为69.8%。在对临床病例模拟的回复中,只有44.3%的安大略省妇科外科医生遵循了临床实践指南。在临床病例模拟期间,妇科肿瘤学家比非肿瘤学家更有可能自我报告根据临床实践指南进行手术分期(P = 0.0004)。遵循情况还与在大学中心的执业(P = 0.013)以及在有妇科肿瘤学家的中心的执业(P = 0.001)显著相关,但与手术量无关。
本研究证实,安大略省上皮性卵巢癌手术分期的当前做法与加拿大相应临床实践指南所定义的理想做法之间存在显著差距。进一步的调查将探索最佳实践的潜在障碍,以促进制定知识转化策略,从而改善安大略省卵巢癌的手术分期。