Biasiotta A, Peddireddy A, Wang K, Romaniello A, Frati A, Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L
Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Orofacial Pain Laboratory, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajars Vej 7D-3, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
To investigate the influence of conditioning cutaneous nociceptive inputs by a new "pinch" model on the jaw-stretch reflex and the exteroceptive suppression periods (ES1 and ES2) in jaw muscles.
The jaw-stretch reflex was evoked with the use of a custom-made muscle stretcher and electrical stimuli were used to evoke an early and late exteroceptive suppression period (ES1 and ES2) in the jaw-closing muscles. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded bilaterally from the masseter and temporalis muscles. These brainstem reflexes were recorded in 19 healthy men (28.8+/-1.1 years) during three different conditions: one painful clip applied to the earlobe; one painful clip applied to the nostril, and four painful clips applied simultaneously to the earlobe, nostril, eyebrow, and lower lip. Pain intensity induced by the application of the clips was scored continuously by the subjects on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
The highest VAS pain scores were evoked by placement of four clips (79+/-0.5mm). There was no significant modulation of the jaw-stretch reflex (ANOVAs: P=0.929), the ES1 (P=0.298) or ES2 (P=0.082) in any of the three painful conditions.
Intense and tonic cutaneous pain could be elicited by this new "pinch" pain model; however, there was no significant modulation on either excitatory or inhibitory brainstem reflex responses.
The novel observation that high-intensity pinch stimuli applied to the craniofacial region fail to modulate two different brainstem reflexes is in contrast to other experimental pain studies documented facilitation of the jaw-stretch reflexes or inhibition of exteroceptive suppression periods. The clinical implication of the present findings is that only some craniofacial pain conditions could be expected to show perturbation of the brainstem reflex responses.
采用一种新的“捏夹”模型调节皮肤伤害性传入,研究其对颌骨牵张反射及颌骨肌肉外感受性抑制期(ES1和ES2)的影响。
使用定制的肌肉拉伸器诱发颌骨牵张反射,用电刺激诱发颌骨闭合肌的早期和晚期外感受性抑制期(ES1和ES2)。双侧咬肌和颞肌记录肌电图(EMG)活动。在19名健康男性(28.8±1.1岁)中,于三种不同情况下记录这些脑干反射:一个疼痛夹夹在耳垂;一个疼痛夹夹在鼻孔;四个疼痛夹同时夹在耳垂、鼻孔、眉毛和下唇。受试者在100mm视觉模拟量表(VAS)上持续对夹夹引起的疼痛强度进行评分。
夹四个夹子时VAS疼痛评分最高(79±0.5mm)。在三种疼痛情况下,颌骨牵张反射(方差分析:P = 0.929)、ES1(P = 0.298)或ES2(P = ?0.082)均无显著调节。
这种新的“捏夹”疼痛模型可引发强烈且持续的皮肤疼痛;然而,对兴奋性或抑制性脑干反射反应均无显著调节。
与其他记录到颌骨牵张反射易化或外感受性抑制期抑制的实验性疼痛研究相反,本研究有新发现,即施加于颅面部区域的高强度捏夹刺激未能调节两种不同的脑干反射。本研究结果的临床意义在于,仅部分颅面部疼痛情况可能会出现脑干反射反应的扰动。