Puchner Stefan, Stadler Alfred, Minar Erich, Lammer Johannes, Bucek Robert A
Department of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Jun;14(3):387-94. doi: 10.1583/06-1970.1.
To evaluate the role of 4 different reformation techniques in comparison with axial images from multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) in the follow-up of renal artery stents.
Data on 40 patients (20 men; mean age 65 years) who underwent MDCTA as part of their routine follow-up after successful primary stenting of a main renal artery were retrospectively analyzed. Multiplanar reformation (MPR), curved planar reformation (CPR), volume rendering threshold (VRT), and virtual angioscopy (VA) were reviewed by 2 independent observers who were blinded to the results of the axial source images, which served as the gold standard. The stenosis degree was scored as I = 0%, II <50%, III = 51%-75%, IV = 76%-99%, or V = occlusion; a stenosis >50% was considered hemodynamically significant.
Five hemodynamically significant stenoses were identified on axial images. The correlation with axial images was perfect for both observers using MPR and CPR (kappa = 1 for each observer); corresponding results were kappa = 0.69 and kappa = 0.64 for VRT and kappa = 0.88 and kappa = 0.83 for VA, respectively. The interobserver correlations were excellent for all reformation techniques (kappa = 0.95 to 1).
Compared to axial images, MPR and CPR correlated perfectly with axial images; VA performed surprisingly well, while VRT was affected by artifacts and consequently showed inferior results.
评估4种不同的重建技术与多排螺旋计算机断层血管造影(MDCTA)的轴位图像相比,在肾动脉支架随访中的作用。
回顾性分析40例患者(20例男性;平均年龄65岁)的数据,这些患者在主肾动脉初次成功置入支架后接受了MDCTA作为常规随访的一部分。由2名独立观察者对多平面重建(MPR)、曲面重建(CPR)、容积再现阈值(VRT)和虚拟血管内镜(VA)进行评估,观察者对作为金标准的轴位源图像结果不知情。狭窄程度分为:I = 0%,II <50%,III = 51%-75%,IV = 76%-99%,或V =闭塞;狭窄>50%被认为具有血流动力学意义。
在轴位图像上发现5处具有血流动力学意义的狭窄。使用MPR和CPR时,两位观察者与轴位图像的相关性均为完美(每位观察者的kappa值均为1);VRT的相应kappa值分别为0.69和0.64,VA的相应kappa值分别为0.88和0.83。所有重建技术的观察者间相关性均极佳(kappa值为0.95至1)。
与轴位图像相比,MPR和CPR与轴位图像的相关性完美;VA表现出人意料地好,而VRT受伪影影响,结果较差。