Ben-Ari Yehezkel
INMED, INSERM U 29, Parc Scientifique etTechnologique de Luminy, Marseille, France.
Crit Rev Neurobiol. 2006;18(1-2):135-44. doi: 10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.140.
Synapses mediated by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptors are notoriously altered during periods of enhanced activity. Since a loss of inhibitory tone is a basic cause of seizures and epilepsies, it is important to determine the underlying mechanisms and the way this could be alleviated or at least reduced. Alterations of the intracellular content of chloride are thought to be a major player in the sequence of events that follow episodes of hyperactivity. In this review, I discuss these mechanisms both in the adult and developing brain, relying on studies in which chloride and GABAergic currents were measured by electrophysiological and imaging techniques. The main conclusion is that in adult systems, status epilepticus induces a complete re-organization of the networks, with cell death, axonal growth, and glutamatergic neosynapse formation leading to an increased glutamatergic drive. This, in turn, will decrease the threshold of seizure generation and thus contribute to seizure generation. In contrast, GABAergic synapses are not readily "plastic" as the lost interneurones and synapses are not replaced. Somatostatin-positive 0-LM Interneurons that innervate the dendrites of the principal cells in the hippocampus degenerate selectively, leading to a loss of the inhibitory drive in the dendrites, whereas somatic projecting basket cells and somatic inhibitory drives are relatively spared. This imbalance leads to a reduction of the inhibitory strength that is necessary but not sufficient to generate ongoing seizures. An additional important factor is the persistent increase of the intracellular chloride concentration that leads to a long-lasting shift in the depolarizing direction of the actions of GABA that will also contribute to seizure generation. In the developing brain, a major source of seizure generation is the depolarizing and often excitatory actions of GABA due to a higher intracellular chloride concentration ([Cl-]I) in immature neurons, a property that has been confirmed in all developing systems and animal species studied. As a consequence, immature GABAergic synapses will excite targets and facilitate the emergence of seizures, in keeping with the well-known higher incidence of seizures in the developing brain. Using a unique preparation with two intact hippocampi placed in a three-compartment chamber in vitro, we have provided direct evidence that seizures beget seizures and that GABA signaling plays a central role in this phenomenon. Indeed, recurrent seizures triggered in one hippocampus by a convulsive agent propagate to the other hippocampus and transform the naive hippocampus into one that generates seizures once disconnected from the other hippocampus. This transformation is conditioned by the occurrence during the seizures of high-frequency oscillations (40 Hz and above). Interestingly, these oscillations are only produced when N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA-) and GABA receptors are operative and not blocked in the naïve hippocampus. Therefore, GABA-receptor antagonists are pro-convulsive in the developing brain but, in fact, anti-epileptic. This paradoxical conclusion has quite a few clinical implications that are discussed.
由γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)A受体介导的突触在活动增强期间会发生显著改变。由于抑制性张力的丧失是癫痫发作和癫痫的一个基本原因,因此确定其潜在机制以及缓解或至少减轻这种情况的方法非常重要。细胞内氯离子含量的改变被认为是活动亢进发作后一系列事件中的主要因素。在这篇综述中,我将依据通过电生理和成像技术测量氯离子和GABA能电流的研究,来讨论成人和发育中大脑的这些机制。主要结论是,在成人大脑中,癫痫持续状态会诱导网络的完全重组,包括细胞死亡、轴突生长和谷氨酸能新突触形成,从而导致谷氨酸能驱动增加。这反过来会降低癫痫发作的阈值,进而促成癫痫发作。相比之下,GABA能突触不太容易“可塑性变化”,因为丢失的中间神经元和突触无法被替代。支配海马体中主要细胞树突的生长抑素阳性0-LM中间神经元会选择性退化,导致树突中的抑制性驱动丧失,而投射到胞体的篮状细胞和胞体抑制性驱动相对未受影响。这种失衡导致抑制强度降低,这对于引发持续性癫痫发作来说是必要的,但并不充分。另一个重要因素是细胞内氯离子浓度持续升高,这会导致GABA作用的去极化方向发生持久改变,也会促成癫痫发作。在发育中的大脑中,癫痫发作的一个主要来源是由于未成熟神经元中细胞内氯离子浓度([Cl-]I)较高,GABA会产生去极化且通常具有兴奋性作用,这一特性在所有研究的发育系统和动物物种中都得到了证实。因此,未成熟的GABA能突触会兴奋靶细胞并促进癫痫发作的出现,这与发育中大脑癫痫发作发生率较高这一众所周知的情况相符。我们使用一种独特的制剂,将两个完整的海马体置于体外三室腔室中,提供了直接证据表明癫痫发作会引发癫痫发作,并且GABA信号在这一现象中起核心作用。的确,由惊厥剂在一个海马体中引发的反复癫痫发作会传播到另一个海马体,并将未发作的海马体转变为一旦与另一个海马体分离就会发作的海马体。这种转变取决于癫痫发作期间高频振荡(40赫兹及以上)的出现。有趣的是,只有当N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体和GABA受体在未发作的海马体中起作用且未被阻断时,才会产生这些振荡。因此,GABA受体拮抗剂在发育中的大脑中具有促惊厥作用,但实际上却是抗癫痫的。这一矛盾的结论具有不少临床意义,本文将对此进行讨论。