Departamento de Biotecnología and Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 29;2(8):e786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000786.
Virulence does not represent any obvious advantage to parasites. Most models of virulence evolution assume that virulence is an unavoidable consequence of within-host multiplication of parasites, resulting in trade-offs between within-host multiplication and between-host transmission fitness components. Experimental support for the central assumption of this hypothesis, i.e., for a positive correlation between within-host multiplication rates and virulence, is limited for plant-parasite systems.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have addressed this issue in the system Arabidopsis thaliana-Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). Virus multiplication and the effect of infection on plant growth and on viable seed production were quantified for 21 Arabidopsis wild genotypes infected by 3 CMV isolates. The effect of infection on plant growth and seed production depended of plant architecture and length of postembryonic life cycle, two genetically-determined traits, as well as on the time of infection in the plant's life cycle. A relationship between virus multiplication and virulence was not a general feature of this host-parasite system. This could be explained by tolerance mechanisms determined by the host genotype and operating differently on two components of plant fitness, biomass production and resource allocation to seeds. However, a positive relationship between virus multiplication and virulence was detected for some accessions with short life cycle and high seed weight to biomass ratio, which show lower levels of tolerance to infection.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results show that genotype-specific tolerance mechanisms may lead to the absence of a clear relationship between parasite multiplication and virulence. Furthermore, a positive correlation between parasite multiplication and virulence may occur only in some genotypes and/or environmental conditions for a given host-parasite system. Thus, our results challenge the general validity of the trade-off hypothesis for virulence evolution, and stress the need of considering the effect of both the host and parasite genotypes in analyses of host-parasite interactions.
对于寄生虫来说,毒力并没有表现出任何明显的优势。大多数毒力进化模型假设,毒力是寄生虫在体内繁殖的必然结果,从而导致了体内繁殖和宿主间传播适应度之间的权衡。对于植物-寄生虫系统来说,实验对这一假设的核心假设,即体内繁殖率与毒力之间存在正相关关系,提供的支持是有限的。
方法/主要发现:我们在拟南芥-黄瓜花叶病毒(CMV)系统中解决了这个问题。我们对 21 种拟南芥野生基因型在被 3 种 CMV 分离株感染后的病毒繁殖以及感染对植物生长和可育种子产生的影响进行了量化。感染对植物生长和种子产生的影响取决于植物结构和胚胎后生命周期的长度,这是两个由遗传决定的特征,以及植物生命周期中感染的时间。感染与毒力之间的关系并不是这个宿主-寄生虫系统的一般特征。这可以用宿主基因型决定的耐受机制来解释,这些机制在植物适应度的两个组成部分(生物量产生和资源分配到种子)上以不同的方式起作用。然而,对于一些生命周期短、种子重量与生物量比高的系,我们检测到病毒繁殖与毒力之间存在正相关关系,这些系对感染的耐受程度较低。
结论/意义:这些结果表明,特定基因型的耐受机制可能导致寄生虫繁殖与毒力之间没有明显的关系。此外,对于特定的宿主-寄生虫系统,寄生虫繁殖与毒力之间的正相关关系可能仅在某些基因型和/或环境条件下发生。因此,我们的结果对毒力进化的权衡假设的普遍有效性提出了挑战,并强调了在分析宿主-寄生虫相互作用时需要考虑宿主和寄生虫基因型的影响。