Zebrowitz L A, Kendall-Tackett K, Fafel J
Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1991 Oct;52(2):221-38. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(91)90060-6.
It was hypothesized that the perception of maturefaced children as more able to follow complicated instructions, more likely to know right from wrong, more shrewd, and physically stronger than their babyfaced peers would lead parents to assign more demanding tasks to these children and to judge their misbehavior more harshly. Study 1 revealed that parents allocated more cognitively demanding, but not more physically demanding, chores to maturefaced 11 year old depicted in photographs than to babyfaced children of the same age and attractiveness. Study 2 revealed that parents perceived the misbehaviors of maturefaced 4- and 11-year-old children as more intentional than those of their babyfaced peers, an effect that was significant only when parents judged children of the opposite sex. Study 2 further revealed that, with perceived intentionality held constant, a babyface mitigated the severity of punishment recommended for relatively serious infractions by preschoolers, while increasing it for older children. The latter finding was discussed in light of other evidence that people react negatively to the disconfirmation of their benign expectations regarding babyfaced individuals, and that parents perceived the misbehaviors as more unexpected for 11 year olds than 4 year olds.
研究假设认为,相较于有着娃娃脸的同龄人,有着成熟面孔的孩子被认为更有能力遵循复杂的指令、更有可能明辨是非、更机灵且身体更强壮,这会导致父母给这些孩子分配更具挑战性的任务,并对他们的不当行为做出更严厉的评判。研究1表明,与照片中有着娃娃脸的同龄且具有相同吸引力的孩子相比,父母会给有着成熟面孔的11岁孩子分配更多认知要求高但体力要求不高的家务。研究2表明,父母认为有着成熟面孔的4岁和11岁孩子的不当行为比有着娃娃脸的同龄人更具故意性,这种效应仅在父母评判异性孩子时显著。研究2还进一步表明,在故意性被视为不变的情况下,娃娃脸会减轻父母对学龄前儿童相对严重违规行为建议的惩罚力度,而对于年龄较大的孩子则会加大惩罚力度。根据其他证据对后一发现进行了讨论,这些证据表明人们会对他们对有着娃娃脸的个体的良性期望被否定做出负面反应,而且父母认为11岁孩子的不当行为比4岁孩子的更出乎意料。