Traino A C, Ferrari M, Cremonesi M, Stabin M G
Sezione di Fisica Medica, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Sep 7;52(17):5231-48. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/17/009. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
To perform patient-specific, blood-based red-marrow dosimetry, dose conversion factors (the S factors in the MIRD formalism) have to be scaled by patients' organ masses. The dose to red marrow includes both self-dose and cross-irradiation contributions. Linear mass scaling for the self-irradiation term only is usually applied as a first approximation, whereas the cross-irradiation term is considered to be mass independent. Recently, the need of a mass scaling correction on both terms, not necessarily linear and dependent on the radionuclide, has been highlighted in the literature. S-factors taking into account different mass adjustments of organs are available in the OLINDA/EXM code. In this paper, a general algorithm able to fit the mass-dependent factors S(rm<--tb) and S(rm<--rm) is suggested and included in a more general equation for red-marrow dose calculation. Moreover, parameters to be considered specifically for therapeutic radionuclides such as (131)I, (90)Y and 177Lu are reported. The red-marrow doses calculated by the traditional and new algorithms are compared for (131)I in ablation therapy (14 pts), 177Lu- (13 pts) and (90)Y- (11 pts) peptide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours, and (90)Y-Zevalin therapy for NHL (21 pts). The range of differences observed is as follows: -36% to -10% for (131)I ablation, -22% to 5% for 177Lu-DOTATATE, -9% to 11% for (90)Y-DOTATOC and -8% to 6% for (90)Y-Zevalin. All differences are mostly due to the activity in the remainder of the body contributing to cross-irradiation. This paper quantifies the influence of mass scaling adjustment on usually applied therapies and shows how to derive the appropriate parameters for other radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals.
为了进行针对患者的基于血液的红骨髓剂量测定,剂量转换因子(MIRD形式体系中的S因子)必须根据患者的器官质量进行缩放。红骨髓所接受的剂量包括自吸收剂量和交叉辐射剂量贡献。通常首先采用仅对自吸收项进行线性质量缩放作为近似方法,而交叉辐射项则被认为与质量无关。最近,文献中强调了对这两项都进行质量缩放校正的必要性,这种校正不一定是线性的,且依赖于放射性核素。OLINDA/EXM代码中提供了考虑器官不同质量调整的S因子。本文提出了一种能够拟合质量相关因子S(rm<--tb)和S(rm<--rm)的通用算法,并将其纳入一个更通用的红骨髓剂量计算方程中。此外,还报告了针对治疗性放射性核素如(131)I、(90)Y和177Lu需要特别考虑的参数。比较了传统算法和新算法计算的红骨髓剂量,这些病例包括:(131)I消融治疗(14例)、177Lu-(13例)和(90)Y-(11例)肽治疗神经内分泌肿瘤以及(90)Y-Zevalin治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤(21例)。观察到的差异范围如下:(131)I消融治疗为-36%至-10%,177Lu-DOTATATE为-22%至5%,(90)Y-DOTATOC为-9%至11%,(90)Y-Zevalin为-8%至6%。所有差异主要归因于身体其余部分的活度对交叉辐射的贡献。本文量化了质量缩放调整对常用治疗方法的影响,并展示了如何为其他放射性核素和放射性药物推导合适的参数。