Majane Olebogeng H I, Norton Gavin R, Maseko Muzi J, Makaula Siyanda, Crowther Nigel, Paiker Janice, Thijs Lutgarde, Brooksbank Richard, Sareli Pinhas, Staessen Jan A, Woodiwiss Angela J
Cardiovascular Pathophysiology and Genomics Research Unit, School of Physiology, South Africa.
J Hypertens. 2007 Sep;25(9):1798-806. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3281e6666f.
The relationship between waist circumference (WC) and conventional blood pressure (BP) is independent of other clinical indices of adiposity. As ambulatory BP may offer more prognostic information than conventional BP, we aimed to identify whether indices of central adiposity are associated with ambulatory BP independent of other indices of adiposity.
The relationship between indices of adiposity [WC, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index (BMI) or skin-fold thickness] and ambulatory or conventional BP was determined in 300 randomly selected individuals of African descent living in an urban developing community in South Africa. Relationships were determined with multiple indices of adiposity in the same regression model and after adjusting for age, gender, alcohol and tobacco intake, the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus or inappropriate blood glucose control [haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], antihypertensive therapy and menopausal status.
Sixty-five per cent of participants were overweight or obese. With respect to the relationships between indices of adiposity, BMI and WC showed the strongest correlation (r=0.84, P<0.0001). After including all indices of adiposity and confounders in the model, WC was the only clinical index of adiposity which independently predicted 24-h (partial r=0.15, P<0.005) and conventional (partial r=0.14, P<0.005) systolic BP and 24-h (partial r=0.13, P<0.02) and conventional (partial r=0.40, P<0.0001) diastolic BP. After adjusting for other adiposity indices and confounders, every 1 SD (15 cm) increase in WC resulted in a 4.04 mmHg increase in 24-h systolic BP and a 4.33 mmHg increase in 24-h diastolic BP. Similar results were obtained in the subgroup of 237 participants not receiving antihypertensive therapy.
WC is the only clinical index of adiposity that is associated with 24-h and conventional BP independent of other adiposity indices in a community with a high prevalence of obesity.
腰围(WC)与传统血压(BP)之间的关系独立于其他肥胖临床指标。由于动态血压可能比传统血压提供更多的预后信息,我们旨在确定中心性肥胖指标是否独立于其他肥胖指标与动态血压相关。
在南非一个城市发展社区中随机选取300名非洲裔个体,确定肥胖指标[腰围、腰臀比、体重指数(BMI)或皮褶厚度]与动态或传统血压之间的关系。在同一回归模型中,以及在调整年龄、性别、酒精和烟草摄入量、是否存在糖尿病或血糖控制不佳[糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]、抗高血压治疗和绝经状态后,确定这些关系。
65%的参与者超重或肥胖。关于肥胖指标之间的关系,BMI与WC的相关性最强(r = 0.84,P < 0.0001)。在模型中纳入所有肥胖指标和混杂因素后,WC是唯一能独立预测24小时(偏相关系数r = 0.15,P < 0.005)和传统(偏相关系数r = 0.14,P < 0.005)收缩压以及24小时(偏相关系数r = 0.13,P < 0.02)和传统(偏相关系数r = 0.40,P < 0.0001)舒张压的肥胖临床指标。在调整其他肥胖指标和混杂因素后,WC每增加1个标准差(15厘米),24小时收缩压升高4.04毫米汞柱,24小时舒张压升高4.33毫米汞柱。在未接受抗高血压治疗的237名参与者亚组中也得到了类似结果。
在肥胖患病率较高的社区中,WC是唯一与24小时血压和传统血压相关且独立于其他肥胖指标的肥胖临床指标。