Potter Margaret A, Sweeney Patricia, Iuliano Angela D, Allswede Michael P
Center for Public Health Practice, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Sep-Oct;13(5):510-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000285205.40964.28.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether published reports of infectious disease outbreaks could serve as a source of evidence for public health practice, particularly in responding to bioterrorism. Such performance indicators are measures of practice and process that lead to optimal health outcomes. We collected data from 116 individual articles that described 59 outbreaks of eight different pathogens with potential for bioterrorist use. Analysis of these reports determined whether they addressed 12 process indicators and four outcome indicators--each generally recognized as a component of effective outbreak response. The results showed that outbreak reports typically included information about these process and outcome indicators, thus validating their practical importance. However, few reports had been written with specificity to document the chronology of outbreak response, or the dissemination of information to protect healthcare workers, or the communication with law enforcement and emergency operations that are important in response to bioterrorism. We conclude that the published record of infectious disease outbreaks can, in the future, be used as a source for practice-based evidence if agreed-upon measures for effective performance become standard components of outbreak reports.
本研究的目的是确定已发表的传染病暴发报告是否可作为公共卫生实践的证据来源,尤其是在应对生物恐怖主义方面。此类绩效指标是对实践和过程的衡量,可带来最佳健康结果。我们从116篇单独的文章中收集了数据,这些文章描述了8种不同病原体的59次暴发,这些病原体具有被用于生物恐怖主义的可能性。对这些报告的分析确定了它们是否涉及12个过程指标和4个结果指标——每个指标通常都被认为是有效应对暴发的一个组成部分。结果表明,暴发报告通常包含有关这些过程和结果指标的信息,从而验证了它们的实际重要性。然而,很少有报告专门撰写以记录暴发应对的时间顺序、为保护医护人员而进行的信息传播,或与执法部门和应急行动的沟通,而这些在应对生物恐怖主义方面很重要。我们得出结论,如果商定的有效绩效衡量标准成为暴发报告的标准组成部分,那么未来已发表的传染病暴发记录可作为基于实践的证据来源。