Cost effectiveness of non-invasive tests including duplex scanning for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. A prospective study carried out on 511 patients.

Recent studies have elucidated the cost-effectiveness of various diagnostic methods used to detect deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs. These methods include Doppler, plethysmography and labelled fibrogen tests. However, duplex scanning has recently proven to be a more reliable examination. With a view to establishing a realistic appraisal of matters as they stand, the authors have carried out a prospective study to compare the relative cost-effectiveness of purely physical examination, duplex scanning associated with strain-gauge plethysmography, contrast venography indicated for each proximal DVT, and contrast venography as a first-choice examination. 511 consecutive patients suspected of DVT of the lower limbs were examined using the various non-invasive methods cited above. 185 of the patients underwent contrast venography. When compared with those of the non-invasive tests, the results of the latter examination provided for extrapolation to the total population of 511 patients so as to better evaluate costs. We are able to conclude that physical examination alone is neither cost-effective nor risk free. Non-invasive tests, which are more reliable, provide annual savings greater than 1,500,000 FF ($ 240,000) with respect to venography. Performing venography for each proximal DVT increases spending by little: savings are again greater than 1,200,000 FF ($ 192,000).