Leising Daniel, Rehbein Diana, Sporberg Doreen
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2007 Oct;89(2):116-25. doi: 10.1080/00223890701468428.
The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-64; Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000) is a self-report measure of maladaptive relationship behavior. Ninety-five adult female participants completed the IIP-64 and then interacted with a same-sex confederate in three diagnostic role plays, designed to evoke assertive responses. After each role play, both the participant and the confederate judged how assertive the participant had been, using two subscales from the Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS; Wiggins, 1995). The participants' general self-images, assessed with the IIP-64, were quite congruent with how they judged their own assertiveness in the role plays. But when role-play assertiveness was judged by the confederate, the match with the participants' general self-images was considerably lower. Our results indicate that self-reported interpersonal problems do not converge well with external judgments of interpersonal behavior.
人际问题量表(IIP - 64;霍洛维茨、奥尔登、威金斯和平卡斯,2000)是一种对适应不良的关系行为进行自我报告的测量工具。95名成年女性参与者完成了IIP - 64量表,然后在三个旨在引发自信反应的诊断性角色扮演中与一名同性同盟者进行互动。每次角色扮演后,参与者和同盟者都使用人际形容词量表(IAS;威金斯,1995)中的两个分量表来评判参与者的自信程度。用IIP - 64量表评估的参与者的总体自我形象,与他们在角色扮演中对自己自信程度的判断相当一致。但当由同盟者来评判角色扮演中的自信程度时,与参与者总体自我形象的匹配度则要低得多。我们的结果表明,自我报告的人际问题与人际行为的外部判断不太一致。