Horvath K, Bock G, Regittnig W, Bodenlenz M, Wutte A, Plank J, Magnes C, Sinner F, Fürst-Recktenwald S, Theobald K, Pieber T R
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10(6):484-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00734.x. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
To compare the end-organ metabolic effects of insulin glulisine (glulisine), insulin lispro (lispro) and regular human insulin (RHI) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Eighteen patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (mean age 36.9 +/- 8.6 years, BMI 23.6 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2), haemoglobin A(1c) 7.4 +/- 0.9%) were randomized in this single-centre, double-blind, three-period cross-over, standard Latin-square, euglycaemic glucose clamp trial. Patients received sequential, primed stepwise intravenous infusions of glulisine, lispro or RHI (infusion rates were increased in a stepwise manner from an initial rate of 0.33 [180 min] to 0.66 [180 min] and 1.00 [180 min] mU/kg/min). The primary variables were the suppression of endogenous glucose production (S(EGP)) and glucose uptake (GU).
Mean basal endogenous glucose production (EGP) was 1.88, 2.12 and 2.12 mg/kg/min for glulisine, lispro and RHI respectively. Mean (+/-s.e.) maximum absolute S(EGP) (adjusted for basal EGP) was -1.64 +/- 0.06, -1.72 +/- 0.05 and -1.56 +/- 0.05 mg/kg/min respectively. Mean (+/-s.e.) maximum absolute increase in GU (adjusted for basal GU) was 6.46 +/- 0.26, 6.23 +/- 0.24 and 6.72 +/- 0.24 mg/kg/min respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences between the three insulin treatments with respect to serum insulin, free fatty acid (FFA), glycerol or lactate levels. No serious adverse events and no episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were reported.
This study shows that glulisine, lispro and RHI have similar effects on S(EGP), GU, FFA, glycerol and lactate levels, providing evidence for similar end-organ metabolic effects.
比较门冬胰岛素、赖脯胰岛素和常规人胰岛素对1型糖尿病患者终末器官代谢的影响。
18例1型糖尿病患者(平均年龄36.9±8.6岁,体重指数23.6±2.8kg/m²,糖化血红蛋白7.4±0.9%)被随机分配至本单中心、双盲、三阶段交叉、标准拉丁方、正常血糖葡萄糖钳夹试验。患者依次接受门冬胰岛素、赖脯胰岛素或常规人胰岛素的静脉推注和逐步输注(输注速率从初始速率0.33[180分钟]逐步增加至0.66[180分钟]和1.00[180分钟]mU/kg/分钟)。主要变量为内源性葡萄糖生成抑制(S(EGP))和葡萄糖摄取(GU)。
门冬胰岛素、赖脯胰岛素和常规人胰岛素的平均基础内源性葡萄糖生成(EGP)分别为1.88、2.12和2.12mg/kg/分钟。平均(±标准误)最大绝对S(EGP)(根据基础EGP调整)分别为-1.64±0.06、-1.72±0.05和-1.56±0.05mg/kg/分钟。平均(±标准误)GU最大绝对增加值(根据基础GU调整)分别为6.46±0.26、6.23±0.24和6.72±0.24mg/kg/分钟。三种胰岛素治疗在血清胰岛素、游离脂肪酸(FFA)、甘油或乳酸水平方面无临床相关差异。未报告严重不良事件和严重低血糖发作。
本研究表明,门冬胰岛素、赖脯胰岛素和常规人胰岛素对S(EGP)、GU、FFA、甘油和乳酸水平具有相似的影响,为相似的终末器官代谢效应提供了证据。