Hsu Jong-Hau, Wang Chien-Kuo, Hung Chueh-Wen, Wang Shie-Shan, Cheng Kuang-I, Wu Jiunn-Ren
Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007 Sep;23(9):435-41. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70050-0.
In patients who require a permanent central venous catheter (PCVC), the usual aim is to put the catheter tip at the superior vena cava and right atrium (SVC-RA) junction. However, there is no study regarding how to guide the positioning of the catheter tip when the SVC-RA junction cannot be identified on chest radiograph. The objectives of this prospective study were: (1) to investigate the incidence and etiologies of radiographically undetermined SVC-RA junctions in cancer patients undergoing PCVC implantation; and (2) to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of combined transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to guide the positioning of catheters during implantations in patients without this radiographic landmark. Over a 1-year study period, 83 consecutive patients with oncologic diseases who required implantation of a PCVC in a tertiary center were screened. Their preoperative chest radiographs were examined by radiologists to identify the presence of the SVC-RA junction. Patients without a radiographically identifiable SVC-RA junction were classified as cancer-related or cancer-unrelated in terms of etiology. For patients without this landmark, we used TEE with a pediatric biplane transducer and a LMA under intravenous general anesthesia during PCVC implantation to guide the positioning of the catheter tip at the SVC-RA junction. We found that in 16% (13/83) of patients, the SVC-RA junction could not be identified on radiograph. Among the 13 patients, only three (23%) had cancer-related etiologies. In all of the 13 patients, the LMA was successfully placed after the TEE transducer was inserted. No episode of air leak from the LMA was found during surgery. All had the catheter tip positioned in the anatomic SVC-RA junction under TEE guidance. In conclusion, 16% of cancer patients requiring PCVC implantation had no identifiable SVC-RA junction on chest radiograph and most causes were cancer-unrelated. In patients without a radiographically identifiable SVC-RA junction, guidance by TEE under LMA general anesthesia is a feasible, safe and effective management to position a PCVC at the SVC-RA junction.
对于需要植入永久性中心静脉导管(PCVC)的患者,通常的目标是将导管尖端置于上腔静脉与右心房(SVC-RA)交界处。然而,尚无关于在胸部X线片上无法识别SVC-RA交界处时如何指导导管尖端定位的研究。这项前瞻性研究的目的是:(1)调查接受PCVC植入的癌症患者中,影像学上无法确定SVC-RA交界处的发生率及病因;(2)评估在没有这种影像学标志的患者植入导管过程中,联合经食管超声心动图(TEE)和喉罩气道(LMA)指导导管定位的可行性、有效性和安全性。在为期1年的研究期间,对一家三级中心83例连续需要植入PCVC的肿瘤疾病患者进行了筛查。放射科医生检查了他们术前胸部X线片以确定SVC-RA交界处是否存在。根据病因,胸部X线片上无法识别SVC-RA交界处的患者被分类为癌症相关或癌症无关。对于没有这个标志的患者,我们在PCVC植入期间于静脉全身麻醉下使用配备小儿双平面探头的TEE和LMA来指导将导管尖端置于SVC-RA交界处。我们发现,16%(13/83)的患者在X线片上无法识别SVC-RA交界处。在这13例患者中,只有3例(23%)有癌症相关病因。在所有13例患者中,插入TEE探头后LMA均成功置入。手术期间未发现LMA漏气。所有患者在TEE引导下导管尖端均位于解剖学SVC-RA交界处。总之,16%需要植入PCVC的癌症患者在胸部X线片上无法识别SVC-RA交界处,且大多数病因与癌症无关。对于胸部X线片上无法识别SVC-RA交界处的患者,在LMA全身麻醉下由TEE引导是将PCVC置于SVC-RA交界处的一种可行、安全且有效的管理方法。