Irvin Charlene B, Afilalo Marc, Sherman Scott C, Stack Steven J, Huckson Sue, Kaji Amy, Eskin Barnet
Wayne State University School of Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):1030-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.022. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
Health care policy can facilitate emergency medicine knowledge translation (KT). Because of this, the 2007 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on KT identified a specific theme regarding issues of health care policy and KT. Six months before the Consensus Conference, international experts in the area were invited to communicate on health care policies regarding all areas of KT via e-mail and "Google groups." From this communication, and using available evidence, specific recommendations and research questions were developed. At the Consensus Conference, additional comments were incorporated. This report summarizes the results of this collaborative effort and provides a set of recommendations and accompanying research questions to guide development, implementation, and evaluation of health care policies intended to promote KT in emergency medicine. The recommendations are to 1a) involve appropriate stakeholders in the health care policy process; 1b) collaborate with policy makers when health care policy focus areas are being developed; 2) use previously validated clinical practice guideline development tools; 3) address implementation issues during the development of health care policies; 4) monitor outcomes with performance measures appropriate to different practice environments; and 5) plan periodic reviews to uncover new clinical evidence, new methods to improve KT, and new technologies. To advance the further development of these recommendations, a research agenda is proposed.
医疗保健政策可促进急诊医学知识转化(KT)。正因如此,2007年急诊医学学术共识会议关于知识转化确定了一个关于医疗保健政策与知识转化问题的特定主题。在共识会议召开前六个月,该领域的国际专家受邀通过电子邮件和“谷歌群组”就知识转化所有领域的医疗保健政策进行交流。通过此次交流,并利用现有证据,制定了具体建议和研究问题。在共识会议上,纳入了更多意见。本报告总结了这一合作成果,并提供了一系列建议及相应研究问题,以指导旨在促进急诊医学知识转化的医疗保健政策的制定、实施和评估。建议如下:1a)让适当的利益相关者参与医疗保健政策制定过程;1b)在制定医疗保健政策重点领域时与政策制定者合作;2)使用先前经过验证的临床实践指南制定工具;3)在医疗保健政策制定过程中解决实施问题;4)使用适合不同实践环境的绩效指标监测结果;5)计划定期审查,以发现新的临床证据、改进知识转化的新方法和新技术。为推动这些建议的进一步发展,提出了一项研究议程。