Okuda Shinya, Oda Takenori, Miyauchi Akira, Haku Takamitsu, Yamamoto Tomio, Iwasaki Motoki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka 591-8025, Japan.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89 Suppl 2 Pt.2:310-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00307.
We are aware of no reports on the surgical results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in patients older than seventy years of age and compare them with results in younger patients. We also investigated the association between the clinical and radiographic results.
The study included 101 patients who had been followed for at least three years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws for the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The average follow-up period was fifty months. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of the operation: Group 1 included thirty-one patients who were seventy years of age or older (average age, seventy-four years) at the time of the operation, and Group 2 included seventy patients who were less than seventy years old (average age, fifty-nine years). Preoperative and postoperative status (according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system) and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative radiographic features, including fusion status and segmental lordosis, were also examined.
No significant differences in preoperative and postoperative scores were observed between the two age groups, with the numbers available. General complications were found in Group 1. However, the prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Group 1 was lower than that in Group 2. The radiographic results revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of segmental lordosis, with the numbers available. There was no nonunion in either group. Although the prevalence of either collapsed union or delayed union in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in Group 2 (p = 0.034), the fusion results such as union in situ, collapsed union, and delayed union did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study.
No obvious differences in the clinical results were observed between the age groups with the numbers available. Postoperative adjacent segment degeneration was less frequent and collapsed union and delayed union were more common in the elderly group. The fusion results did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study.
我们尚未发现有关老年患者后路腰椎椎间融合术手术结果的报道。本研究的目的是调查70岁以上患者行后路腰椎椎间融合术并使用椎弓根螺钉的临床和影像学结果,并将其与年轻患者的结果进行比较。我们还研究了临床和影像学结果之间的关联。
本研究纳入了101例行后路腰椎椎间融合术并使用椎弓根螺钉治疗L4-L5退行性椎体滑脱且随访至少三年的患者。平均随访时间为50个月。根据手术时的年龄将患者分为两组:第1组包括31例手术时年龄在70岁及以上(平均年龄74岁)的患者,第2组包括70例年龄小于70岁(平均年龄59岁)的患者。比较两组术前和术后状况(根据日本骨科协会评分系统)以及术后并发症。还检查了术后影像学特征,包括融合状态和节段性前凸。
在有数据的两个年龄组之间,术前和术后评分未观察到显著差异。第1组发现了一般并发症。然而,第1组相邻节段退变的发生率低于第2组。影像学结果显示,在有数据的情况下,节段性前凸的发生率没有显著差异。两组均未出现不融合。虽然第1组塌陷融合或延迟融合的发生率显著高于第2组(p = 0.034),但在本研究中,诸如原位融合、塌陷融合和延迟融合等融合结果似乎并未影响术后临床结果。
在有数据的年龄组之间,临床结果未观察到明显差异。老年组术后相邻节段退变较少见,塌陷融合和延迟融合更常见。在本研究中,融合结果似乎并未影响术后临床结果。