Judge Andrew, Evans Simon, Gunnell David J, Albertsen Peter C, Verne Julia, Martin Richard M
MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1040-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07118.x. Epub 2007 Sep 3.
To investigate the morbidity and mortality after radical prostatectomy (RP) in relation to the numbers of RPs carried out at individual hospitals, as recent studies of complex surgery report worse outcomes in low-volume hospitals, and there has been a large increase in RPs for localized prostate cancer.
We analysed hospital episode statistics data for all 18 027 RPs in English National Health Service hospitals between 1997 and 2004.
In multivariate analysis, there was a U-shaped association of hospital volume with mortality (P for nonlinear trend, 0.004), but this finding was based on only 59 (0.3%) deaths. The mean length of stay was 6 days and decreased by 2.96% (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.98-3.92; P < 0.001) per quintile increase in hospital volume. In all, 16.1% of men had 30-day in-hospital complications; 20.3% were readmitted with complications within a year. The odds of 30-day in-hospital wound/bleeding complications decreased by 6% (95% CI 1-11; P = 0.02), and miscellaneous medical complications decreased by 10% (0-19; P = 0.04) per increase in hospital volume quintile. For re-admissions within a year, the hazard of vascular complications decreased by 15% (6-22; P = 0.001), wound/bleeding complications decreased by 8% (2-13; P = 0.01) and genitourinary complications decreased by 5% (2-8; P = 0.002), per increase in hospital volume quintile.
In men undergoing RP the length of hospital stay and rates of some short- and long-term postoperative complications afterward are lower in high-volume hospitals. The magnitudes of these effects on the outcomes studied may be too small and inconsistent to indicate a policy of selective referral to high-volume hospitals. Quality of life and oncological outcomes, however, could not be investigated in this dataset.
鉴于近期有关复杂手术的研究表明,低手术量医院的手术结果较差,且局限性前列腺癌的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)数量大幅增加,本研究旨在探讨RP术后发病率和死亡率与各医院实施的RP手术数量之间的关系。
我们分析了1997年至2004年间英国国民健康服务体系医院中所有18027例RP手术的医院事件统计数据。
多变量分析显示,医院手术量与死亡率呈U形关联(非线性趋势P值为0.004),但这一发现仅基于59例(0.3%)死亡病例。平均住院时间为6天,医院手术量每增加一个五分位数,住院时间就减少2.96%(95%置信区间,CI,1.98 - 3.92;P < 0.001)。总体而言,16.1%的男性患者有30天内的住院并发症;20.3%的患者在一年内因并发症再次入院。医院手术量每增加一个五分位数,30天内住院伤口/出血并发症的几率降低6%(95%CI 1 - 11;P = 0.02),其他医疗并发症降低10%(0 - 19;P = 0.04)。对于一年内再次入院的情况,医院手术量每增加一个五分位数,血管并发症的风险降低15%(6 - 22;P = 0.001),伤口/出血并发症降低8%(2 - 13;P = 0.01),泌尿生殖系统并发症降低5%(2 - 8;P = 0.002)。
在接受RP手术的男性患者中,高手术量医院的住院时间以及一些短期和长期术后并发症的发生率较低。这些对所研究结果的影响程度可能过小且不一致,不足以表明应采取选择性转诊至高手术量医院的政策。然而,本数据集中无法对生活质量和肿瘤学结果进行调查。