Herzog Charles A, Littrell Kathee, Arko Cheryl, Frederick Paul D, Blaney Martha
Cardiovascular Special Studies Center, US Renal Data System, 914 S 8th St, Ste S-206, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.
Circulation. 2007 Sep 25;116(13):1465-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.696765. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is catastrophic for dialysis patients. This study set out to determine the clinical characteristics of dialysis patients hospitalized for AMI in the United States.
This retrospective cohort study used data from the US Renal Data System (USRDS) database (n=1,285,177) and the third National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI 3) (n=537,444). AMI hospitalizations from April 1, 1998, through June 30, 2000, were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, clinical modification, codes 410, 410.x, 410.x0, and 410.x1. The 9418 unique dialysis patients identified with AMI hospitalizations in the USRDS database were cross-matched with the NRMI registry, creating a cohort for analysis that consisted of 3049 matching patients. Clinical characteristics of dialysis and nondialysis (n=534,395) AMI patients were compared by use of the chi2 test. Of clinical significance, 44.8% of dialysis patients were diagnosed as not having acute coronary syndrome on admission, versus 21.2% of nondialysis patients; 44.4% presented with chest pain, versus 68.3% of nondialysis patients; and 19.1% had ST elevation, versus 35.9% of nondialysis patients. Cardiac arrest was twice as frequent for dialysis patients (11.0% versus 5.0%), and in-hospital death was nearly so (21.3% versus 11.7%). In a logistic regression model, the odds ratio for in-hospital death for dialysis versus nondialysis patients was 1.498 (95% CI, 1.340 to 1.674).
Dialysis patients hospitalized for AMI differ strikingly from nondialysis patients, which possibly explains their poor outcomes. Intensive efforts for early, accurate recognition of AMI in dialysis patients are warranted.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)对透析患者来说是灾难性的。本研究旨在确定美国因AMI住院的透析患者的临床特征。
这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)数据库(n = 1,285,177)和第三次全国心肌梗死注册中心(NRMI 3)(n = 537,444)的数据。通过使用国际疾病分类第9版临床修订本代码410、410.x、410.x0和410.x1,确定了1998年4月1日至2000年6月30日期间的AMI住院病例。在美国肾脏数据系统数据库中确定的9418例因AMI住院的独特透析患者与NRMI注册中心进行交叉匹配,创建了一个由3049例匹配患者组成的分析队列。通过卡方检验比较了透析和非透析(n = 534,395)AMI患者的临床特征。具有临床意义的是,44.8%的透析患者入院时被诊断为没有急性冠状动脉综合征,而非透析患者为21.2%;44.4%的患者表现为胸痛,而非透析患者为68.3%;19.1%的患者有ST段抬高,而非透析患者为35.9%。透析患者心脏骤停的发生率是其两倍(11.0%对5.0%),住院死亡率也几乎如此(21.3%对11.7%)。在逻辑回归模型中,透析患者与非透析患者住院死亡的比值比为1.498(95%CI,1.340至1.674)。
因AMI住院的透析患者与非透析患者有显著差异,这可能解释了他们较差的预后。有必要加大力度对透析患者进行早期、准确的AMI识别。