In "Effect of Rutin on Anaphylactic and Histamine Shock" by R. J. Raiman, E. R. Later, and H. Necheles (Science, October 17, p. 368), the first sentence of the last paragraph should read as follows: "Another explanation for the protective effect of rutin may be that it prevents the liberation of endogenous histamine, perhaps by unknown factors other than those which decrease capillary permeability."
在 R. J. Raiman、E. R. Later 和 H. Necheles 的《芦丁对过敏性和组胺休克的影响》(Science,10 月 17 日,第 368 页)中,最后一段的第一句话应该如下:“芦丁保护作用的另一种解释可能是它阻止内源性组胺的释放,也许是通过除了降低毛细血管通透性以外的未知因素。”