Science. 1962 Jun 22;136(3521):1023-31. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3521.1023.
We have examined the two types of explanations of the moon illusion-the egocentric, in which the differences in direction of the horizon and the zenith moons are thought of in relation to different angles of regard of the observer, and the objective, in which the presence or absence of the terrain is considered crucial. The former type is exemplified chiefly by the eye-elevation hypothesis in the work of Boring and his colleagues; the latter, by the apparent-distance hypothesis based on the superior cues to distance provided by the terrain. Boring had rejected the apparent-distance hypothesis on the grounds that the horizon moon is reported as nearer, not farther away, by most observers. He then performed experiments which supported the eye-elevation hypothesis.
我们已经考察了关于月面幻觉的两种解释——主观的解释和客观的解释。主观解释认为,地平线和天顶方向的月亮差异与观察者不同的注视角度有关;客观解释则认为,地形的有无是关键。前者的例子主要来自于 Boring 和他的同事的眼高假说;后者的例子则来自于基于地形提供的更高级距离线索的视在距离假说。Boring 因为大多数观察者报告说地平线方向的月亮看起来更近而不是更远,所以拒绝了视在距离假说。然后,他进行了支持眼高假说的实验。