Suppr超能文献

一项随机双盲安慰剂对照多中心研究,旨在探讨坦索罗辛和托特罗定对膀胱过度活动症女性患者的疗效和安全性。

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study to explore the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin and tolterodine in women with overactive bladder syndrome.

作者信息

Robinson Dudley, Cardozo Linda, Terpstra Gerben, Bolodeoku John

机构信息

King's College Hospital, Department of Urogynaecology, London, UK.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):840-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07162.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin oral-controlled absorption system (OCAS) vs placebo in overactive bladder (OAB), to evaluate the safety and tolerability of once-daily dosing with tamsulosin OCAS, and to compare the efficacy and safety with tolterodine extended-release (ER).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A parallel-group, multicentre, multinational study was conducted with a single-blind placebo run-in period of 2 weeks, followed by a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy active and placebo-controlled treatment period of 6 weeks; women (aged 18-70 years) with symptoms of OAB for >/= 3 months were recruited. Women were randomized to receive one of four doses of tamsulosin OCAS (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 mg), 4 mg of tolterodine ER, or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in the mean number of voids/24 h. Secondary efficacy variables included change from baseline in; mean volume voided per void, mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h, mean number of urgency episodes/24 h and in quality of life (QoL), as assessed using the Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ).

RESULTS

Overall, 364 women were randomized; the primary efficacy analysis showed that the difference from placebo in the mean number of voids/24 h was not statistically significant for tamsulosin OCAS 1.5 mg (P = 0.189). There was no statistically significant difference for tolterodine ER 4 mg vs placebo in the mean number of voids/24 h (P = 0.353). Similarly, for the secondary outcome variables there was no statistically significant difference between tamsulosin and placebo. Although women taking tolterodine ER 4 mg had a consistently greater increase in mean voided volume/void and consistent decreases in incontinence episodes/24 h, urgency episodes/24 h and episodes of nocturia/24 h, this was not statistically significant. There was no significant improvement in QoL scores across the treatment groups. Tamsulosin OCAS was well tolerated and the proportion of women discontinuing because of adverse events was low (4.7%).

CONCLUSION

Tamsulosin is not effective for treating OAB in women and the evidence from this study does not support its use on an empirical basis.

摘要

目的

评估坦索罗辛口服控释系统(OCAS)与安慰剂相比治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的疗效,评估坦索罗辛OCAS每日一次给药的安全性和耐受性,并与托特罗定缓释剂(ER)比较疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

进行了一项平行组、多中心、跨国研究,有2周的单盲安慰剂导入期,随后是6周的随机、双盲、双模拟活性药物和安慰剂对照治疗期;招募有OAB症状≥3个月的18 - 70岁女性。女性被随机分为接受四剂坦索罗辛OCAS(0.25、0.5、1.0或1.5毫克)之一、4毫克托特罗定ER或安慰剂,每日一次,共6周。主要疗效变量是平均排尿次数/24小时的变化。次要疗效变量包括自基线的变化;每次排尿的平均尿量、失禁发作次数/24小时、尿急发作次数/24小时以及生活质量(QoL),使用国王健康问卷(KHQ)进行评估。

结果

总体而言,364名女性被随机分组;主要疗效分析表明,1.5毫克坦索罗辛OCAS在平均排尿次数/24小时方面与安慰剂的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.189)。4毫克托特罗定ER与安慰剂在平均排尿次数/24小时方面也无统计学差异(P = 0.353)。同样,对于次要结局变量,坦索罗辛与安慰剂之间无统计学差异。尽管服用4毫克托特罗定ER的女性每次排尿的平均尿量持续增加幅度更大,失禁发作次数/24小时、尿急发作次数/24小时和夜尿发作次数/24小时持续减少,但差异无统计学意义。各治疗组的QoL评分均无显著改善。坦索罗辛OCAS耐受性良好,因不良事件停药的女性比例较低(4.7%)。

结论

坦索罗辛对治疗女性OAB无效,本研究证据不支持凭经验使用该药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验