乌干达基于社区的孕期疟疾间歇性预防治疗服务体系及其对各保健单位基本孕产妇保健利用情况的影响。

A community-based delivery system of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy and its effect on use of essential maternity care at health units in Uganda.

作者信息

Mbonye Anthony K, Bygbjerg I C, Magnussen Pascal

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Ministry of Health, Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Nov;101(11):1088-95. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.06.017. Epub 2007 Sep 5.

Abstract

Community delivery of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) is one potential option that could mitigate malaria in pregnancy. However, there is concern that this approach may lead to complacency among women with low access to essential care at health units. A non-randomised community trial assessed a new delivery system of IPTp through traditional birth attendants, drug shop vendors, community reproductive health workers and adolescent peer mobilisers (the intervention) compared with IPTp at health units (control). The study enrolled a total of 2081 pregnant women with the new approaches. Data on care-seeking practices before and after the intervention were collected. The majority of women with the new approaches accessed IPTp in the second trimester and adhered to two doses of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) (1404/2081; 67.5%). Antenatal care (four recommended visits) increased from 3.4% (27/805) to 56.8% (558/983) (P<0.001). The proportion of women delivering at health units increased from 34.3% (276/805) to 41.5% (434/1045) (P=0.02), whilst the proportion of women seeking care for malaria at health units increased from 16.7% (128/767) to 36.0% (146/405) (P<0.001). Similarly, use of insecticide-treated nets increased from 7.7% (160/2081) to 22.4% (236/1055) (P<0.001). In conclusion, the community-based system was effective in delivering IPTp, whilst women still accessed and benefited from essential care at health units.

摘要

社区开展孕期疟疾间歇性预防治疗(IPTp)是减轻孕期疟疾的一种潜在选择。然而,有人担心这种方法可能会使那些难以获得卫生机构基本护理的妇女产生懈怠情绪。一项非随机社区试验评估了一种通过传统助产士、药店商贩、社区生殖健康工作者和青少年同伴动员者实施IPTp的新给药系统(干预组),并与在卫生机构实施的IPTp(对照组)进行比较。该研究共纳入了2081名采用新方法的孕妇。收集了干预前后寻求护理行为的数据。大多数采用新方法的妇女在孕中期接受了IPTp,并坚持服用了两剂磺胺多辛/乙胺嘧啶(SP)(1404/2081;67.5%)。产前检查(四次建议检查)从3.4%(27/805)增加到56.8%(558/983)(P<0.001)。在卫生机构分娩的妇女比例从34.3%(276/805)增加到41.5%(434/1045)(P=0.02),而在卫生机构寻求疟疾治疗的妇女比例从16.7%(128/767)增加到36.0%(146/405)(P<0.001)。同样,使用经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐的比例从7.7%(160/2081)增加到22.4%(236/1055)(P<0.001)。总之,基于社区的系统在提供IPTp方面是有效的,同时妇女仍然能够获得卫生机构的基本护理并从中受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索