Suppr超能文献

每周使用多西他赛与多西他赛/吉西他滨治疗老年或身体状况较差的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者:Minnie Pearl癌症研究网络的一项随机3期试验

Weekly docetaxel versus docetaxel/gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.

作者信息

Hainsworth John D, Spigel David R, Farley Cindy, Shipley Dianna L, Bearden James D, Gandhi Jitendra, Ann Houston Gerry, Anthony Greco F

机构信息

Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2027-34. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-agent weekly docetaxel with the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine in elderly and/or poor performance status patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who were either >65 years old or had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2 were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive weekly docetaxel (36 mg/m(2)) Days 1, 8, and 15 or docetaxel (30 mg/m(2))/gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) Days 1, 8, and 15. Both regimens were repeated on 28-day cycles for 6 cycles or until disease progression.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty patients were randomized, and 345 received treatment. The median age of patients was 74 years; 38% were >75 years old, and 35% had ECOG performance status 2. Intent-to-treat analysis showed median survivals of 5.5 months versus 5.1 months in the groups receiving docetaxel/gemcitabine versus weekly docetaxel, respectively (P = .65). There were no survival differences detected with docetaxel/gemcitabine versus weekly docetaxel in the 223 patients with good performance status (7.2 months vs 8.0 months, respectively) or in the 122 poor performance status patients (3.8 months vs 2.9 months, respectively). Median time-to-progression was longer in patients who received docetaxel/gemcitabine (4.8 months vs 2.9 months; P = .004). Both regimens were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with docetaxel/gemcitabine produced a modest improvement in time-to-progression but had no impact on survival when compared with single-agent weekly docetaxel in this group of patients. Results with both regimens were disappointing, particularly in patients with poor performance status. Improved treatment for these patients will require the introduction of novel, well-tolerated, targeted agents.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较单药每周一次多西他赛与多西他赛联合吉西他滨用于老年和/或体能状态较差的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效。

方法

既往未接受治疗、年龄>65岁或东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为2的IIIB/IV期NSCLC患者符合条件。患者被随机分为接受每周一次多西他赛(36mg/m²),于第1、8和15天给药,或多西他赛(30mg/m²)/吉西他滨(800mg/m²),于第1、8和15天给药。两种方案均每28天为一个周期重复进行,共6个周期或直至疾病进展。

结果

350例患者被随机分组,345例接受了治疗。患者的中位年龄为74岁;38%的患者年龄>75岁,35%的患者ECOG体能状态为2。意向性分析显示,接受多西他赛/吉西他滨组与每周一次多西他赛组的中位生存期分别为5.5个月和5.1个月(P = 0.65)。在223例体能状态良好的患者中(分别为7.2个月和8.0个月)以及122例体能状态较差的患者中(分别为3.8个月和2.9个月),多西他赛/吉西他滨组与每周一次多西他赛组之间未检测到生存差异。接受多西他赛/吉西他滨治疗的患者中位疾病进展时间更长(4.8个月对2.9个月;P = 0.004)。两种方案总体耐受性良好。

结论

与单药每周一次多西他赛相比,多西他赛/吉西他滨治疗使疾病进展时间有适度改善,但对该组患者的生存无影响。两种方案的结果均令人失望,尤其是在体能状态较差的患者中。改善这些患者的治疗需要引入新型、耐受性良好的靶向药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验