Farran Emily K
Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):385-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) demonstrate impaired visuo-spatial abilities in comparison to their level of verbal ability. In particular, visuo-spatial construction is an area of relative weakness. It has been hypothesised that poor or atypical location coding abilities contribute strongly to the impaired abilities observed on construction and drawing tasks [Farran, E. K., & Jarrold, C. (2005). Evidence for unusual spatial location coding in Williams syndrome: An explanation for the local bias in visuo-spatial construction tasks? Brain and Cognition, 59, 159-172; Hoffman, J. E., Landau, B., & Pagani, B. (2003). Spatial breakdown in spatial construction: Evidence from eye fixations in children with Williams syndrome. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 260-301]. The current experiment investigated location memory in WS. Specifically, the precision of remembered locations was measured as well as the biases and strategies that were involved in remembering those locations. A developmental trajectory approach was employed; WS performance was assessed relative to the performance of typically developing (TD) children ranging from 4- to 8-year-old. Results showed differential strategy use in the WS and TD groups. WS performance was most similar to the level of a TD 4-year-old and was additionally impaired by the addition of physical category boundaries. Despite their low level of ability, the WS group produced a pattern of biases in performance which pointed towards evidence of a subdivision effect, as observed in TD older children and adults. In contrast, the TD children showed a different pattern of biases, which appears to be explained by a normalisation strategy. In summary, individuals with WS do not process locations in a typical manner. This may have a negative impact on their visuo-spatial construction and drawing abilities.
与语言能力水平相比,威廉姆斯综合征(WS)患者表现出视觉空间能力受损。特别是,视觉空间构建是一个相对薄弱的领域。据推测,较差或非典型的位置编码能力在很大程度上导致了在构建和绘图任务中观察到的能力受损[Farran, E. K., & Jarrold, C. (2005). 威廉姆斯综合征中异常空间位置编码的证据:对视觉空间构建任务中局部偏差的一种解释?《大脑与认知》, 59, 159 - 172; Hoffman, J. E., Landau, B., & Pagani, B. (2003). 空间构建中的空间分解:来自威廉姆斯综合征儿童眼动注视的证据。《认知心理学》, 46, 260 - 301]。当前实验研究了威廉姆斯综合征患者的位置记忆。具体而言,测量了记忆位置的精度以及记忆这些位置所涉及的偏差和策略。采用了发展轨迹方法;相对于4至8岁的正常发育(TD)儿童的表现,评估了威廉姆斯综合征患者的表现。结果显示,威廉姆斯综合征组和正常发育组使用了不同的策略。威廉姆斯综合征患者的表现与4岁正常发育儿童的水平最为相似,并且由于增加了物理类别边界而进一步受损。尽管能力水平较低,但威廉姆斯综合征组在表现上产生了一种偏差模式,这指向了细分效应的证据,正如在年龄较大的正常发育儿童和成年人中所观察到的那样。相比之下,正常发育儿童表现出不同的偏差模式,这似乎可以用归一化策略来解释。总之,威廉姆斯综合征患者处理位置的方式不典型。这可能会对他们的视觉空间构建和绘图能力产生负面影响。