Suppr超能文献

利益相关者对科学家的看法:1984年至2001年太浩湖环境政策

Stakeholder perceptions of scientists: Lake Tahoe environmental policy from 1984 to 2001.

作者信息

Weible Christopher M

机构信息

School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, 685 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0345, USA.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2007 Dec;40(6):853-65. doi: 10.1007/s00267-007-9005-2. Epub 2007 Sep 11.

Abstract

What factors explain stakeholders' perceptions of scientists in environmental politics? Questionnaire data are used to examine stakeholders' views of scientific experts in the context of Lake Tahoe environmental policy from 1984 to 2001. Stakeholders' perceptions of scientists have remained the same over time - despite a shift from adversarial to collaborative policymaking and after decades of mounting scientific evidence showing water quality declines. On average, stakeholders perceive scientists with limited influence on Lake Tahoe environmental policy and view them with mixed levels of skepticism. Stakeholders' evaluation of scientists is best explained by their beliefs about development versus the environment. Stakeholders in favor of more land development express distrust of scientists and negatively evaluate university researchers and consultants. Stakeholders in favor of environmental protection are more likely to trust scientists and positively evaluate university researchers and consultants.

摘要

哪些因素解释了利益相关者对环境政治中科学家的看法?问卷调查数据被用于考察1984年至2001年太浩湖环境政策背景下利益相关者对科学专家的看法。尽管政策制定从对抗转向合作,且数十年不断增加的科学证据表明水质在下降,但利益相关者对科学家的看法长期以来保持不变。平均而言,利益相关者认为科学家对太浩湖环境政策的影响有限,并以不同程度的怀疑看待他们。利益相关者对科学家的评价最好由他们对发展与环境的信念来解释。支持更多土地开发的利益相关者对科学家表示不信任,并对大学研究人员和顾问给予负面评价。支持环境保护的利益相关者更有可能信任科学家,并对大学研究人员和顾问给予正面评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验