Smit-Glaudé Sietsia W D, van Strien Jan W, Licht Robert, Bakker Dirk J
Enkhuizen & Hoorn, The Netherlands.
Ann Dyslexia. 2005 Dec;55(2):217-45. doi: 10.1007/s11881-005-0012-9.
Kindergarten children at risk of developing language problems were administered the Florida Kindergarten Screening Battery. A principal components analysis revealed a verbal and a visual-spatial component and subsequent discriminant function analyses a high verbal/low visual-spatial group (LAL: Latent L) and a high visual-spatial/low verbal group (LAP: Latent P). LAL- and LAP-children were considered at risk for developing an L- or P-type of dyslexia, respectively. As is common practice with children suffering from manifest L- or P- dyslexia, the LAL- and LAP-kindergartners received right and left hemisphere stimulation, respectively. The outcomes were compared with those of bilateral hemispheric stimulation and no intervention. Reading tests were administered in primary school Grades 1 and 5/6; teachers' evaluation of reading took place in Grade 5/6. Overall, the LAL- and LAP- groups showed significant backwardness in word and text reading, both at early and late primary school. Types of intervention made a difference though: not significantly backward in early word, late word, and late text reading were the LAL-children who had received right hemisphere stimulation. Nonintervened LAP-children did not show significant backwardness in early word reading and late text reading, nor did LAP-children who had received left hemisphere or bilateral stimulation. Early text reading was not affected by any treatment. Teacher's evaluations were in support of these findings.
对有发展语言问题风险的幼儿园儿童进行了佛罗里达幼儿园筛查量表测试。主成分分析揭示了一个语言成分和一个视觉空间成分,随后的判别函数分析确定了一个高语言/低视觉空间组(LAL:潜在L)和一个高视觉空间/低语言组(LAP:潜在P)。LAL儿童和LAP儿童分别被认为有发展L型或P型诵读困难的风险。与患有明显L型或P型诵读困难的儿童的常见做法一样,LAL幼儿园儿童和LAP幼儿园儿童分别接受了右半球和左半球刺激。将结果与双侧半球刺激组和无干预组的结果进行了比较。在小学1年级和5/6年级进行了阅读测试;在5/6年级进行了教师对阅读的评估。总体而言,LAL组和LAP组在小学早期和晚期的单词和文本阅读方面均表现出显著落后。不过,干预类型产生了影响:接受右半球刺激的LAL儿童在早期单词、晚期单词和晚期文本阅读方面没有显著落后。未接受干预的LAP儿童在早期单词阅读和晚期文本阅读方面没有表现出显著落后,接受左半球或双侧刺激的LAP儿童也没有。早期文本阅读不受任何治疗的影响。教师的评估支持了这些发现。