Yang X F, Xiao Y, Xu M-Y
Department of Physiology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008;115(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0808-3. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
The present study examines the effect of acetylcholine (ACh), muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) agonist pilocarpine and mAChRs antagonist atropine on the pain-evoked response of pain-excited neurons (PEN) and pain-inhibited neurons (PIN) in the hippocampal CA1 of rats. The trains of electric impulses applied to the sciatic nerve were used as noxious stimulation. The discharges of PEN and PIN in the hippocampal CA1 were recorded by glass microelectrode. The results showed that intrahippocampal microinjection of ACh (2 microg/1 microl) or pilocarpine (2 microg/1 microl) decreased the frequency of discharge of PEN, and increased the frequency of discharge of PIN evoked by the noxious stimulation in the hippocampal CA1, while intrahippocampal administration of atropine (0.5 microg/1 microl) produced opposite response. On the basis of the above findings, we can deduce that ACh and mAChRs are involved in the modulation of nociceptive information transmission in the hippocampal CA1.
本研究检测了乙酰胆碱(ACh)、毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体(mAChRs)激动剂毛果芸香碱和mAChRs拮抗剂阿托品对大鼠海马CA1区痛兴奋神经元(PEN)和痛抑制神经元(PIN)痛诱发放电反应的影响。将施加于坐骨神经的一串电脉冲用作伤害性刺激。用玻璃微电极记录海马CA1区PEN和PIN的放电。结果显示,海马内微量注射ACh(2微克/1微升)或毛果芸香碱(2微克/1微升)可降低PEN的放电频率,并增加海马CA1区伤害性刺激诱发的PIN的放电频率,而海马内注射阿托品(0.5微克/1微升)则产生相反的反应。基于上述发现,我们可以推断ACh和mAChRs参与了海马CA1区伤害性信息传递的调制。