Suppr超能文献

验证老年人跌倒行为(FaB)量表:拉施分析

Validating the Falls Behavioural (FaB) scale for older people: a Rasch analysis.

作者信息

Clemson Lindy, Bundy Anita C, Cumming Robert G, Kay Lynn, Luckett Tim

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(7):498-06. doi: 10.1080/09638280701355546.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Rasch modelling was used to establish the validity and robustness of the Falls Behavioural (FaB) Scale for Older people.

METHODS

The sample comprised 678 community-residing elderly people aged 65 - 98 years. Data were analysed by calculating goodness of fit statistics, principal components analysis of residuals and by exploring the effectiveness of the category rating response-scale.

RESULTS

A partial-credit rating scale was the best fitting solution and the major change to the original version of the FaB. Analysis supported a 29-item intervention version and a briefer 24-item outcome evaluation (research) version. The latter produced item mean infit statistics of 1.00 (Z = 0.0, SD = 0.33) and mean outfit statistics of 1.03 (Z = 0.0, SD = 0.53), a person separation of 2.36 and internal reliability of 0.85.

CONCLUSION

The 29 item partial rating scale is valid, reliable and would be useful in clinical situations when used as a prompt for discussion and in raising clients' awareness of potential hazards; it also can be used as an outcome measure. The short form is a useful alternate for evaluating the effectiveness of fall reduction interventions that aim to encourage protective strategies when negotiating the environment, mobilizing and doing activities of daily living. Both scales would be improved by adding very difficult and very easy items to increase the range of ability levels of the people to whom it can be applied with precision.

摘要

目的

采用拉施模型来确立老年人跌倒行为(FaB)量表的有效性和稳健性。

方法

样本包括678名年龄在65 - 98岁之间居住在社区的老年人。通过计算拟合优度统计量、残差的主成分分析以及探索类别评分反应量表的有效性来分析数据。

结果

部分计分评定量表是最佳拟合方案,也是对FaB原始版本的主要改动。分析支持了一个29项的干预版本和一个更简短的24项结果评估(研究)版本。后者的项目平均内拟合统计量为1.00(Z = 0.0,标准差 = 0.33),平均外拟合统计量为1.03(Z = 0.0,标准差 = 0.53),人员分离度为2.36,内部信度为0.85。

结论

29项部分评定量表有效、可靠,在临床情况下用作讨论提示并提高客户对潜在危害的认识时很有用;它也可作为一种结果测量工具。简短版本对于评估旨在鼓励在应对环境、活动和进行日常生活活动时采取保护策略的跌倒预防干预措施的有效性是一种有用的替代方法。通过添加极难和极易的项目以扩大能够精确应用该量表的人群的能力水平范围,这两个量表都会得到改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验