Nunnink Sarah, Meana Marta
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5030, USA.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Dec;28(4):201-8. doi: 10.1080/01674820701388781.
Endometriosis diagnosis and treatment planning are guided primarily by retrospective pain recall, despite the facts that (1) there is only a tenuous relationship between pain reports and physical pathology, and (2) the accuracy of pain recall has never been assessed in this population. The current study investigated the accuracy of endometriotic pain recall for pain experienced over a 30-day period, as well as potential psychological mediators of pain recall accuracy, including psychological wellbeing, distress specific to infertility, passive and active coping, and pain present at time of recall in 100 women with endometriosis. Findings indicated that women were relatively accurate in their recall of pain. Only passive coping and pain present at recall were predictive of accuracy, with greater passive coping and lower pain at recall predictive of overestimation of past pain. Study implications are discussed, including: (1) report of pain over a 30-day duration appears credible for the majority of patients with endometriosis and (2) women exhibiting greater passive coping may benefit from psychological treatment in addition to medical intervention.
子宫内膜异位症的诊断和治疗方案主要依据患者对既往疼痛的回忆来制定,尽管存在以下事实:(1)疼痛报告与身体病理状况之间的关联很微弱;(2)从未在这一人群中评估过疼痛回忆的准确性。本研究调查了100名子宫内膜异位症患者对30天内经历疼痛的回忆准确性,以及疼痛回忆准确性的潜在心理调节因素,包括心理健康、不孕相关困扰、被动和主动应对方式,以及回忆时存在的疼痛。研究结果表明,女性对疼痛的回忆相对准确。只有被动应对方式和回忆时存在的疼痛能够预测回忆准确性,被动应对程度越高且回忆时疼痛程度越低,越容易高估过去的疼痛。本文讨论了该研究的意义,包括:(1)对于大多数子宫内膜异位症患者来说,报告30天内的疼痛似乎是可信的;(2)表现出更多被动应对方式的女性除了接受医学干预外,可能还会从心理治疗中获益。