Geraerts Elke, McNally Richard J, Jelicic Marko, Merckelbach Harald, Raymaekers Linsey
Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Memory. 2008 Jan;16(1):22-8. doi: 10.1080/09658210701390628.
There are two types of recovered memories: those that gradually return in recovered memory therapy and those that are spontaneously recovered outside the context of therapy. In the current study, we employed a thought suppression paradigm, with autobiographical experiences as target thoughts, to test whether individuals reporting spontaneously recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) are more adept at suppressing positive and anxious autobiographical thoughts, relative to individuals reporting CSA memories recovered in therapy, relative to individuals with continuous abuse memories, and relative to controls reporting no history of abuse. Results showed that people reporting spontaneously recovered memories are superior in suppressing anxious autobiographical thoughts, both in the short term and long term (7 days). Our findings may partly explain why people with spontaneous CSA memories have the subjective impression that they have "repressed" their CSA memories for many years.
那些在恢复记忆疗法中逐渐恢复的记忆,以及那些在治疗背景之外自发恢复的记忆。在当前的研究中,我们采用了一种思维抑制范式,以自传体经历作为目标思维,来测试报告童年性虐待(CSA)自发恢复记忆的个体,相对于报告在治疗中恢复的CSA记忆的个体、相对于有持续性虐待记忆的个体以及相对于报告无虐待史的对照组,是否更善于抑制积极和焦虑的自传体思维。结果表明,报告自发恢复记忆的人在短期和长期(7天)内抑制焦虑自传体思维方面表现更优。我们的研究结果可能部分解释了为什么有自发CSA记忆的人会有这样的主观印象,即他们已经“压抑”自己的CSA记忆多年。