Lange Rael T, Iverson Grant L, Franzen Michael D
British Columbia Mental Health and Addiction Services, Department of Research, Riverview Hospital, Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;22(2):209-27. doi: 10.1080/13854040701290062.
The purpose of this study was to compare 104 patients with acute uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) to a sample of 104 patients from an inpatient substance abuse program to determine whether these patients could be differentiated by their pattern of relative cognitive strengths and weaknesses. Patients were matched on age, education, and gender. Eight cognitive measures were used that included tests of attention, memory, and processing speed. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on any of the cognitive measures. Using a two-step cluster analysis procedure (i.e., hierarchical and k-means analyses), seven common profiles were identified. There was no significant difference in the proportions of patients from the MTBI or substance abuse group in each of the seven profiles. These results show that patients with uncomplicated MTBIs could not be reliably differentiated from patients with substance abuse problems on these cognitive measures. This is of particular concern for clinicians evaluating the neuropsychological effects of MTBI in individuals with a comorbid history of substance abuse.
本研究的目的是将104例急性单纯性轻度创伤性脑损伤(MTBI)患者与104例来自住院药物滥用项目的患者样本进行比较,以确定这些患者是否可以通过其相对认知优势和劣势模式加以区分。患者在年龄、教育程度和性别方面进行了匹配。使用了八项认知测试,包括注意力、记忆力和处理速度测试。两组在任何认知测试上均无统计学显著差异。采用两步聚类分析程序(即层次分析和k均值分析),识别出七种常见模式。在这七种模式中,MTBI组或药物滥用组患者的比例没有显著差异。这些结果表明,就这些认知测试而言,单纯性MTBI患者与有药物滥用问题的患者无法可靠区分。这对于评估有药物滥用合并病史个体中MTBI神经心理学效应的临床医生而言尤为重要。