Teichmann Marc, Dupoux Emmanuel, Cesaro Pierre, Bachoud-Lévi Anne-Catherine
INSERM U841, Equipe 1, Neuropsychologie Interventionnelle, Créteil, France.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 15;46(1):174-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.022. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
The role of sub-cortical structures such as the striatum in language remains a controversial issue. Based on linguistic claims that language processing implies both recovery of lexical information and application of combinatorial rules it has been shown that striatal damaged patients have difficulties applying conjugation rules while lexical recovery of irregular forms is broadly spared (e.g., Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., et al. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(2), 266-276). Here we bolstered the striatum-rule hypothesis by investigating lexical abilities and rule application at the phrasal level. Both processing aspects were assessed in a model of striatal dysfunction, namely Huntington's disease (HD). Using a semantic priming task we compared idiomatic prime sentences involving lexical access to whole phrases (e.g., "Paul has kicked the bucket") with idiom-derived sentences that contained passivation changes involving syntactic movement rules (e.g., "Paul was kicked by the bucket"), word changes (e.g., "Paul has crushed the bucket") or either. Target words that were either idiom-related (e.g., "death") reflecting lexical access to idiom meanings, word-related (e.g., "bail") reflecting lexical access to single words, or unrelated (e.g., "table"). HD patients displayed selective abnormalities with passivated sentences whereas priming was normal with idioms and sentences containing only word changes. We argue that the role of the striatum in sentence processing specifically pertains to the application of syntactic movement rules whereas it is not involved in canonical rules required for active structures or in lexical processing aspects. Our findings support the striatum-rule hypothesis but suggest that it should be refined by tracking the particular kind of language rules depending on striatal computations.
诸如纹状体等皮层下结构在语言中的作用仍是一个有争议的问题。基于语言方面的观点,即语言处理既涉及词汇信息的恢复又涉及组合规则的应用,研究表明纹状体受损的患者在应用词形变化规则时存在困难,而不规则形式的词汇恢复大体上未受影响(例如,Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., 等人(1997年)。语言中的神经分离:证据表明心理词典是陈述性记忆的一部分,语法规则由程序系统处理。《认知神经科学杂志》,9(2),266 - 276)。在此,我们通过研究短语层面的词汇能力和规则应用来支持纹状体 - 规则假说。这两个处理方面均在纹状体功能障碍模型,即亨廷顿舞蹈症(HD)中进行评估。我们使用语义启动任务,将涉及对整个短语进行词汇提取的习语启动句(例如,“Paul has kicked the bucket”)与包含涉及句法移动规则的被动变化的习语衍生句(例如,“Paul was kicked by the bucket”)、单词变化(例如,“Paul has crushed the bucket”)或两者皆有的句子进行比较。目标词要么与习语相关(例如,“death”),反映对习语意义的词汇提取;要么与单词相关(例如,“bail”),反映对单个单词的词汇提取;要么不相关(例如,“table”)。HD患者在被动句中表现出选择性异常,而对习语和仅包含单词变化的句子的启动效应正常。我们认为,纹状体在句子处理中的作用具体涉及句法移动规则的应用,而它不参与主动结构所需的规范规则或词汇处理方面。我们的研究结果支持纹状体 - 规则假说,但表明应根据纹状体计算来追踪特定类型的语言规则,从而对该假说进行完善。