Suppr超能文献

两种用于人细小病毒B19感染血清学诊断的商业酶免疫测定法的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of two commercial enzyme immunoassays for serodiagnosis of human parvovirus B19 infection.

作者信息

Enders Martin, Helbig Sabine, Hunjet Andrea, Pfister Heiko, Reichhuber Christine, Motz Manfred

机构信息

Labor Enders und Partner, Institut für Virologie, Infektiologie und Epidemiologie e.V., Rosenbergstrasse 85, 70193 Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2007 Dec;146(1-2):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Sep 12.

Abstract

The present study describes the performance of two commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) employing recombinant capsid proteins derived from baculovirus or from yeast for diagnosis of human parvovirus B19 (B19) infection. At first, 450 sera from routine daily practice submitted consecutively for B19 antibody testing during a 2-week period in March 2006 were tested. Eighty percent of the routine sera were from pregnant women. There was a high degree of accordance between the two assay systems in detection of B19 IgG antibodies (98.9%) and B19 IgM antibodies (98.7%). Specific antibody concentrations of serum specimens with discordant test results (n=11) were within or close to the equivocal range of the respective assay. Subsequently, specificity and sensitivity of the IgM EIAs were assessed in detail by testing 160 sera collected from patients with a defined disease state. Specificity ranged between 94.2 and 98.5% in patients (n=70) with other acute infections or autoimmune diseases. In sera from pregnant women (n=30) and children (n=30) with acute B19 infection, both assays were 100% sensitive. Whereas sensitivity varied from 63.0 to 70.0% in pregnant women (n=30) investigated 8-12 weeks after onset of disease. According to our evaluation the diagnostic performance of the two assay systems appears to be substantially equivalent. Fetal hydrops is sometimes a late complication of gestational B19 infection and maternal B19 IgM antibodies may already have declined to undetectable levels at the time of clinical diagnosis. A negative B19 IgM test during pregnancy should therefore be interpreted with caution.

摘要

本研究描述了两种商业酶免疫测定法(EIA)的性能,这两种方法采用源自杆状病毒或酵母的重组衣壳蛋白来诊断人细小病毒B19(B19)感染。首先,对2006年3月连续两周提交进行B19抗体检测的450份日常临床实践中的血清进行了检测。其中80%的常规血清来自孕妇。两种检测系统在检测B19 IgG抗体(98.9%)和B19 IgM抗体(98.7%)方面具有高度一致性。检测结果不一致的血清标本(n = 11)的特异性抗体浓度在各自检测方法的临界范围内或接近临界范围。随后,通过检测从明确疾病状态的患者中收集的160份血清,详细评估了IgM EIA的特异性和敏感性。在患有其他急性感染或自身免疫性疾病的患者(n = 70)中,特异性在94.2%至98.5%之间。在患有急性B19感染的孕妇(n = 30)和儿童(n = 30)的血清中,两种检测方法的敏感性均为100%。而在疾病发作后8 - 12周进行调查的孕妇(n = 30)中,敏感性从63.0%至70.0%不等。根据我们的评估,这两种检测系统的诊断性能似乎基本相当。胎儿水肿有时是妊娠期B19感染的晚期并发症,在临床诊断时母体B19 IgM抗体可能已经下降到无法检测的水平。因此,孕期B19 IgM检测结果为阴性时应谨慎解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验