Suppr超能文献

定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

作者信息

Tong Allison, Sainsbury Peter, Craig Jonathan

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups).

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed.

RESULTS

Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.

摘要

背景

定性研究探讨临床医生、医疗服务提供者、政策制定者和消费者所遇到的复杂现象。尽管有部分清单可用,但对于任何类型的定性设计都不存在统一的报告框架。

目的

制定一份用于清晰、全面报告定性研究(深度访谈和焦点小组)的清单。

方法

我们在Cochrane和Campbell协议、医学期刊数据库、护理及健康领域数据库、定性研究的系统评价、主要医学期刊的作者或审稿人指南以及相关出版物的参考文献列表中进行了全面检索,以查找用于评估定性研究的现有清单。将22份清单中的76项内容汇编成一份综合清单。所有项目被分为三个领域:(i)研究团队与反思性,(ii)研究设计,(iii)数据分析与报告。去除了重复的项目以及那些模糊、定义过于宽泛且难以评估的项目。

结果

清单中最常包含的项目涉及抽样方法、数据收集的环境、数据收集方法、研究结果的受访者验证、数据记录方法、主题推导的描述以及支持性引语的纳入。我们将所有项目分为三个领域:(i)研究团队与反思性,(ii)研究设计,(iii)数据分析与报告。

结论

COREQ(一份包含32个条目的清单)中包含的标准可帮助研究人员报告研究团队、研究方法、研究背景、研究结果、分析和解释等重要方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验