Krix M, Jenne J W
Forschungsschwerpunkt Innovative Krebsdiagnostik und -therapie, Abteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Radiologe. 2007 Sep;47(9):800-7. doi: 10.1007/s00117-007-1544-2.
In this overview safety aspects of ultrasound contrast agents (USCA) are described and discussed. In general USCA are very safe drugs. However, allergic adverse reactions can rarely occur, particularly due to the colloidal structure of USCA. In addition, the use of USCA could reduce the threshold for acoustically induced bioeffects and has the potential to increase these effects. In in vitro studies and animal trials USCA caused petechial hemorrhages, vascular damage, and the formation of free radicals. Even DNA damage with single strand breaks could be demonstrated. In human studies and clinical practice none of these bioeffects could be observed. In contrast-enhanced echocardiography a higher rate of premature ventricular contractions has been reported when imaging was triggered at the end systole. Compared with other contrast agents contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed no nephrotoxic effects and could prove to be an alternative diagnostic method for patients with renal failure.
在本综述中,对超声造影剂(USCA)的安全性进行了描述和讨论。一般来说,USCA是非常安全的药物。然而,过敏不良反应很少发生,特别是由于USCA的胶体结构。此外,USCA的使用可能会降低声学诱导生物效应的阈值,并有可能增加这些效应。在体外研究和动物试验中,USCA导致了瘀点出血、血管损伤和自由基的形成。甚至可以证明存在单链断裂的DNA损伤。在人体研究和临床实践中,未观察到这些生物效应。在对比增强超声心动图中,当在收缩末期触发成像时,室性早搏的发生率较高。与其他造影剂相比,对比增强超声未显示出肾毒性作用,对于肾衰竭患者可能是一种替代诊断方法。