• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米索前列醇与地诺前列酮引产的对比研究。

Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.

作者信息

Kulshreshtha S, Sharma P, Mohan G, Singh Sunita, Singh Saroj

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, S.N. Medical College and Associated Hospitals, Agra.

出版信息

Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007 Jan-Mar;51(1):55-61.

PMID:17877293
Abstract

Various methods of induction of labour may be associated with risk and complications. Therefore, this study has been undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of intra-vaginal misoprostol (PGE1 analogue) with intra-cervical dinoprostone (PGE2) in progress and induction of labour, the maternal side effects and the foetal outcome. 40 pregnant women aged between 16-35 years with indication of induction of labour participated in the study. Twenty patients (control) were administered 0.5 mg dinoprostone intra-cervically, 12 hourly while 20 patients (study group) were given misoprostol 100 microg, 4 hourly, intravaginally. The mean induction of labour initiation interval was 2.08 +/- 1.46 hours in study group and 2.21 +/- 1.20 hours in dinoprostone group. The Induction delivery interval was 6.92 +/- 4.01 hours in misoprostol group and 12.54 +/- 7.73 in dinoprostone group, whereas vaginal route of delivery was 95% in misoprostol group and 85% in dinoprostone group. Average dosages required were 1.55 +/- 1.02 in misoprostol group and 1.30 +/- 0.46 in dinoprostone group. All these result were statistically significant. Very few maternal side effects were reported in study group. There was no significant difference in foetal out come in either group. Therefore, it can be concluded that misoprostol is easy to administer and is cheap, effective, safe and convenient drug for induction of labour.

摘要

各种引产方法可能都伴有风险和并发症。因此,本研究旨在比较阴道内使用米索前列醇(PGE1类似物)与宫颈内使用地诺前列酮(PGE2)在引产及促宫颈成熟方面的安全性和有效性、产妇副作用及胎儿结局。40名年龄在16至35岁之间有引产指征的孕妇参与了本研究。20名患者(对照组)宫颈内给予0.5mg地诺前列酮,每12小时一次,而20名患者(研究组)阴道内给予100μg米索前列醇,每4小时一次。研究组引产开始间隔的平均时间为2.08±1.46小时,地诺前列酮组为2.21±1.20小时。米索前列醇组引产至分娩间隔为6.92±4.01小时,地诺前列酮组为12.54±7.73小时,米索前列醇组经阴道分娩率为95%,地诺前列酮组为85%。米索前列醇组所需平均剂量为1.55±1.02,地诺前列酮组为1.30±0.46。所有这些结果均具有统计学意义。研究组报告的产妇副作用很少。两组胎儿结局均无显著差异。因此,可以得出结论,米索前列醇易于给药,是一种用于引产的廉价、有效、安全且方便的药物。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.米索前列醇与地诺前列酮引产的对比研究。
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007 Jan-Mar;51(1):55-61.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.足月引产时阴道用米索前列醇与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂的疗效及安全性比较:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
3
[Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].口服米索前列醇与阴道地诺前列酮用于足月引产的随机对照研究
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2008 Oct;212(5):183-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077027. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
4
Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.阴道米索前列醇与前列腺素E2凝胶引产:一项对比研究。
Trop Doct. 2007 Jan;37(1):21-4. doi: 10.1258/004947507779952032.
5
Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.每六小时阴道用米索前列醇与宫颈内用地诺前列酮的疗效及安全性:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;276(2):119-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0313-1.
6
Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.比较阴道内使用米索前列醇与宫颈内使用Cerviprime对宫颈条件不佳者引产的安全性和有效性的前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Apr;28(3):294-7. doi: 10.1080/01443610802054972.
7
Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.初产妇和经产妇引产:一项英国多中心开放标签研究,比较阴道用米索前列醇与地诺前列酮。
BJOG. 2008 Sep;115(10):1279-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01829.x.
8
A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
Singapore Med J. 1997 Jul;38(7):292-4.
9
Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.阴道用米索前列醇治疗胎膜早破
East Mediterr Health J. 2002 Jul-Sep;8(4-5):515-20.
10
Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.阴道用米索前列醇引产:一种比前列腺素F2α凝胶和前列腺素E2阴道栓更有效的药物。
Cent Afr J Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;48(11-12):123-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol, Intravenous Oxytocin, and Intravaginal Dinoprostone for Labor Induction in Pakistani Women.口服米索前列醇、静脉注射缩宫素和阴道内使用地诺前列酮用于巴基斯坦女性引产的疗效与安全性比较研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 31;15(5):e39768. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39768. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.阴道用米索前列醇用于促宫颈成熟和引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.pub2.