Suppr超能文献

在大型商业养牛场环境中基于DNA的亲子鉴定和遗传评估。

DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.

作者信息

Van Eenennaam A L, Weaber R L, Drake D J, Penedo M C T, Quaas R L, Garrick D J, Pollak E J

机构信息

University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2007 Dec;85(12):3159-69. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0284. Epub 2007 Sep 18.

Abstract

Deoxyribonucleic acid-based tests were used to assign paternity to 625 calves from a multiple-sire breeding pasture. There was a large variability in calf output and a large proportion of young bulls that did not sire any offspring. Five of 27 herd sires produced over 50% of the calves, whereas 10 sires produced no progeny and 9 of these were yearling bulls. A comparison was made between the paternity results obtained when using a DNA marker panel with a high (0.999), cumulative parentage exclusion probability (P(E)) and those obtained when using a marker panel with a lower P(E) (0.956). A large percentage (67%) of the calves had multiple qualifying sires when using the lower resolution panel. Assignment of the most probable sire using a likelihood-based method based on genotypic information resolved this problem in approximately 80% of the cases, resulting in 75% agreement between the 2 marker panels. The correlation between weaning weight, on-farm EPD based on pedigrees inferred from the 2 marker panels was 0.94 for the 24 bulls that sired progeny. Partial progeny assignments inferred from the lower resolution panel resulted in the generation of EPD for bulls that actually sired no progeny according to the high-P(E) panel, although the Beef Improvement Federation accuracies of EPD for these bulls were never greater than 0.14. Simulations were performed to model the effect of loci number, minor allele frequency, and the number of offspring per bull on the accuracy of genetic evaluations based on parentage determinations derived from SNP marker panels. The SNP marker panels of 36 and 40 loci produced EPD with accuracies nearly identical to those EPD resulting from use of the true pedigree. However, in field situations where factors including variable calf output per sire, large sire cohorts, relatedness among sires, low minor allele frequencies, and missing data can occur concurrently, the use of marker panels with a larger number of SNP loci will be required to obtain accurate on-farm EPD.

摘要

基于脱氧核糖核酸的检测被用于确定来自多父系繁殖牧场的625头犊牛的父系。犊牛产量存在很大差异,很大比例的年轻公牛没有产生任何后代。27头种公牛中有5头产下了超过50%的犊牛,而10头种公牛没有后代,其中9头是一岁公牛。对使用具有高累积亲子排除概率(P(E))(0.999)的DNA标记面板时获得的父系结果与使用较低P(E)(0.956)的标记面板时获得的结果进行了比较。使用分辨率较低的面板时,很大比例(67%)的犊牛有多个合格的父系。使用基于基因型信息的似然法确定最可能的父系在大约80%的情况下解决了这个问题,导致两个标记面板之间的一致性为75%。对于产下后代的24头公牛,基于从两个标记面板推断的系谱得出的断奶体重与农场估计繁殖值(EPD)之间的相关性为0.94。从分辨率较低的面板推断的部分后代分配导致了根据高P(E)面板实际上没有产下后代的公牛的EPD的产生,尽管这些公牛的牛肉改良联合会EPD准确性从未超过0.14。进行了模拟,以模拟基因座数量、次要等位基因频率和每头公牛的后代数量对基于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记面板的亲子关系确定得出的遗传评估准确性的影响。36个和40个基因座的SNP标记面板产生的EPD准确性与使用真实系谱得出的EPD几乎相同。然而,在实际情况中,包括每个种公牛的犊牛产量可变、种公牛群体庞大、种公牛之间的亲缘关系、低次要等位基因频率和数据缺失等因素可能同时出现,需要使用具有更多SNP基因座的标记面板来获得准确的农场EPD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验