Stagg M J, Lovell M E
Education and Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom.
Injury. 2008 Mar;39(3):323-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.05.016. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
An audit of spinal board usage in 2002 was repeated [Malik MHA, Lovell ME. Current spinal board usage in emergency departments across the UK. Int J Care Injured 2003;34:327-9]. It is acknowledged that this device should be used for extrication and transport, with usual removal after the primary survey. This repeat audit was carried out to try and discover whether there have been changes regarding the use of spinal boards since its publication. We found improvements have been made in some areas including the removal of patients from boards with 21% now removing patients immediately (5% previously) and 58% removing patients following clearance on the lumbar and thoracic spine by a senior clinician after log roll (52% previously). In 2006, 21% (43% previously) are still leaving patients on spinal boards routinely until radiological evidence provides clearance, 45% will place patients on boards after their arrival even if they were not on one in pre-hospital management (48% previously) and the number of boards the department owns, remained similar. In house audits of usage remained largely unchanged at 22%. We recommend ongoing departmental review of practice.
2002年对脊柱板使用情况的审查再次进行[马利克·MHA,洛弗尔·ME。英国急诊科目前脊柱板的使用情况。《国际创伤护理杂志》2003年;34:327 - 329]。人们认识到,该设备应用于解救和转运,在初次检查后通常应移除。此次重复审查旨在试图发现自其发表以来脊柱板的使用是否有变化。我们发现一些方面有了改进,包括从脊柱板上移除患者,现在有21%的人立即移除患者(之前为5%),58%的人在通过滚动翻身由资深临床医生清除腰椎和胸椎病变后移除患者(之前为52%)。在2006年,21%(之前为43%)的人仍常规地将患者留在脊柱板上,直到有影像学证据证明可以清除,45%的人会在患者到达后将其放置在脊柱板上,即使他们在院前处理时没有使用过(之前为48%),并且科室拥有的脊柱板数量保持相似。内部使用审查基本保持在22%不变。我们建议科室持续审查操作规范。