Suppr超能文献

下丘与听神经带宽的比较。I. 使用频谱操控刺激进行测量。

Comparison of bandwidths in the inferior colliculus and the auditory nerve. I. Measurement using a spectrally manipulated stimulus.

作者信息

Mc Laughlin Myles, Van de Sande Bram, van der Heijden Marcel, Joris Philip X

机构信息

Laboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Medical School, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;98(5):2566-79. doi: 10.1152/jn.00595.2007. Epub 2007 Sep 19.

Abstract

A defining feature of auditory systems across animal divisions is the ability to sort different frequency components of a sound into separate neural frequency channels. Narrowband filtering in the auditory periphery is of obvious advantage for the representation of sound spectrum and manifests itself pervasively in human psychophysical studies as the critical band. Peripheral filtering also alters coding of the temporal waveform, so that temporal responses in the auditory periphery reflect both the stimulus waveform and peripheral filtering. Temporal coding is essential for the measurement of the time delay between waveforms at the two ears-a critical component of sound localization. A number of human psychophysical studies have shown a wider effective critical bandwidth with binaural stimuli than with monaural stimuli, although other studies found no difference. Here we directly compare binaural and monaural bandwidths (BWs) in the anesthetized cat. We measure monaural BW in the auditory nerve (AN) and binaural BW in the inferior colliculus (IC) using spectrally manipulated broadband noise and response metrics that reflect spike timing. The stimulus was a pair of noise tokens that were interaurally in phase for all frequencies below a certain flip frequency (f(flip)) and that had an interaural phase difference of pi above f(flip). The response was measured as a function of f(flip) and, using a separate stimulus protocol, as a function of interaural correlation. We find that both AN and IC filter BW depend on characteristic frequency, but that there is no difference in mean BW between the AN and IC.

摘要

动物界听觉系统的一个决定性特征是能够将声音的不同频率成分分类到不同的神经频率通道中。听觉外周的窄带滤波对于声谱的表征具有明显优势,并且在人类心理物理学研究中普遍表现为临界带宽。外周滤波还会改变时间波形的编码,因此听觉外周的时间响应既反映了刺激波形,也反映了外周滤波。时间编码对于测量双耳波形之间的时间延迟至关重要——这是声音定位的关键组成部分。一些人类心理物理学研究表明,与单耳刺激相比,双耳刺激的有效临界带宽更宽,尽管其他研究没有发现差异。在这里,我们直接比较了麻醉猫的双耳和单耳带宽(BW)。我们使用频谱操纵的宽带噪声和反映脉冲时间的响应指标,测量听神经(AN)中的单耳BW和下丘(IC)中的双耳BW。刺激是一对噪声令牌,对于低于某个翻转频率(f(flip))的所有频率,它们在双耳间同相,而在f(flip)以上具有π的双耳相位差。响应作为f(flip)的函数进行测量,并使用单独的刺激方案,作为双耳相关性的函数进行测量。我们发现,听神经和下丘的滤波器BW都取决于特征频率,但听神经和下丘之间的平均BW没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验