Why funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health are so painful.
作者信息
Garrison Howard H, McGuire Kimberly I, Palazzo Robert E
机构信息
FASEB Office of Public Affairs, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
出版信息
Physiologist. 2007 Aug;50(4):129, 131-3.
PMID:17883021
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health are so painful.
Physiologist. 2007 Aug;50(4):129, 131-3.
2
Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
J Pain. 2008 Dec;9(12):1074-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.001.
3
Disappointment in slow-down for biomedical funding.
Nature. 2005 Feb 10;433(7026):559. doi: 10.1038/433559a.
4
The NIH stimulus--the recovery act and biomedical research.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1479-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0901819.
5
Biomedical funding remains flat.
Nature. 2006 Feb 9;439(7077):644. doi: 10.1038/439644a.
6
Good news and bad news.
Physiologist. 2006 Aug;49(4):201, 203-5.
7
Academies seek better prospects for postdocs.
Nature. 2005 Mar 24;434(7032):426. doi: 10.1038/434426a.
8
Biomedical research: facing the opposition.
Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):17-9. doi: 10.1038/440017a.
9
Learning to share.
Nat Med. 2012 Jul 6;18(7):989. doi: 10.1038/nm.2880.
10
Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1088-90. doi: 10.1126/science.1136931.
Zotero 插件