相似文献
1
The Open Access issue revisited.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):753-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.6624.
2
[Der Ophthalmologe - digital options are a sensible supplement to the Journal].
Ophthalmologe. 2012 Mar;109(3):217-8. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2579-y.
3
Open access publishing: a disruptive innovation.
Nurs Outlook. 2014 Mar-Apr;62(2):69-71. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
4
[Role of medical journals in the shaping of medical knowledge].
Lakartidningen. 2004 Oct 28;101(44):3441-3.
5
[Yesterday, today, tomorrow].
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013 Apr;11(4):365-6. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12053.
6
Scientific publishing. Seeking advice on 'open access,' NIH gets an earful.
Science. 2004 Aug 6;305(5685):764. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5685.764b.
7
Editorial.
J Gen Physiol. 2005 Jan;125(1):1-2. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200409233.
8
The downside of open-access publishing.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):791-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1214750.
9
BIROpen: open access meets flexibility.
Br J Radiol. 2013 Apr;86(1024):20130116. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130116. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
Open arms for open access: Toxicological Sciences joins "Oxford Open".
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Dec;100(2):317. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm257.
Zotero 插件