Hamblin Graham D, Jimenez Raphael P, Sorensen Ted S
The Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
J Org Chem. 2007 Oct 12;72(21):8033-45. doi: 10.1021/jo701351p. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
The mechanisms of the chloroenolate-->cyclopropanone step of the "normal" Favorskii rearrangement have been investigated in detail using high-level ab initio calculations. A series of simple alpha-chloroenolates, based on chloroacetone (6), all monomethyl derivatives (7-9), a dimethyl analogue (10), and 1-acetyl-1-chlorocyclohexane (11) was first used to explore and define the basic features of the mechanism, which include the finding of both an "inversion" and a "retention" transition state and that in most cases these arise from separate ground-state conformations of the chloroenolate. These theoretical studies were then extended to an isomeric pair of chloroenolates 1 and 2, the cis- and trans-2-methyl derivatives of 11, which are the reactive intermediates involved in a well-known experimental study carried out by Stork and Borowitz (S-B). Finally, three alpha-chlorocyclohexanone enolate systems 12-14 were studied, since these intermediates have a more restricted enolate geometry. The "inversion" mechanism has been described as an SN2 process but the present results, while supporting a concerted process, is better described as an oxyallyl structure undergoing concerted ring closure. The "retention" mechanism has been described as SN1-like, but the calculations show that this process is also concerted, although much less so, and again involves oxyallyl-like transition-states. The model systems 6-8, 10, and 11 with a potential plane of symmetry have two enantiomeric transition states for inversion and another two for retention of configuration (at the C-Cl center). With 9 and the S-B models 1 and 2, with no symmetry plane, there are a calculated total of four diastereomeric transition states for cyclopropanone ring closure in each case, two for inversion and two for retention. While the transition-state energies calculated for simple chloroenolates favor the inversion process, the S-B models 1 and 2 have almost equal inversion-retention transition-state energies. Solvation simulation calculations of ground states and transition states suggest that the retention mechanism becomes relatively more favored in polar solvents, in agreement with some experimental results. In the chloroenolates 12-14, both inversion and retention mechanisms were also located, these arising from two different ground-state ring conformations of the enolate. In these models, one also finds similar inversion and retention transition-state energies, but again with a small preference for the inversion process.
利用高水平的从头算计算方法,对“正常”法沃斯基重排中氯代烯醇盐→环丙酮步骤的机理进行了详细研究。首先使用了一系列基于氯丙酮(6)的简单α - 氯代烯醇盐、所有的单甲基衍生物(7 - 9)、一种二甲基类似物(10)以及1 - 乙酰基 - 1 - 氯环己烷(11)来探索和确定该机理的基本特征,其中包括发现了“构型翻转”和“构型保持”两种过渡态,并且在大多数情况下,这些过渡态源于氯代烯醇盐不同的基态构象。然后,这些理论研究扩展到了一对异构的氯代烯醇盐1和2,即11的顺式和反式2 - 甲基衍生物,它们是斯托克(Stork)和博罗维茨(Borowitz)(S - B)进行的一项著名实验研究中涉及的反应中间体。最后,研究了三个α - 氯代环己酮烯醇盐体系12 - 14,因为这些中间体的烯醇盐几何结构受到更多限制。“构型翻转”机理被描述为一个SN2过程,但目前的结果虽然支持协同过程,但更适合描述为一个氧代烯丙基结构进行协同的环化反应。“构型保持”机理被描述为类似SN1的过程,但计算表明这个过程也是协同的,尽管协同程度要小得多,并且同样涉及类似氧代烯丙基的过渡态。具有潜在对称面的模型体系6 - 8、10和11,对于构型翻转有两个对映体过渡态,对于构型保持(在C - Cl中心)也有另外两个对映体过渡态。对于没有对称面的9以及S - B模型1和2,计算得出在每种情况下环丙酮环化反应总共存在四个非对映体过渡态,两个用于构型翻转,两个用于构型保持。虽然为简单氯代烯醇盐计算得到的过渡态能量有利于构型翻转过程,但S - B模型1和2的构型翻转 - 构型保持过渡态能量几乎相等。基态和过渡态的溶剂化模拟计算表明,在极性溶剂中构型保持机理相对更受青睐,这与一些实验结果一致。在氯代烯醇盐12 - 14中,也找到了构型翻转和构型保持两种机理,它们源于烯醇盐两种不同的基态环构象。在这些模型中,同样发现了类似的构型翻转和构型保持过渡态能量,但同样略微倾向于构型翻转过程。