• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

K树得分:系统发育树相对分支长度和拓扑结构差异的量化。

The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.

作者信息

Soria-Carrasco Víctor, Talavera Gerard, Igea Javier, Castresana Jose

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Molecular Biodiversity, Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, CSIC, Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2954-6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm466. Epub 2007 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm466
PMID:17890735
Abstract

SUMMARY

We introduce a new phylogenetic comparison method that measures overall differences in the relative branch length and topology of two phylogenetic trees. To do this, the algorithm first scales one of the trees to have a global divergence as similar as possible to the other tree. Then, the branch length distance, which takes differences in topology and branch lengths into account, is applied to the two trees. We thus obtain the minimum branch length distance or K tree score. Two trees with very different relative branch lengths get a high K score whereas two trees that follow a similar among-lineage rate variation get a low score, regardless of the overall rates in both trees. There are several applications of the K tree score, two of which are explained here in more detail. First, this score allows the evaluation of the performance of phylogenetic algorithms, not only with respect to their topological accuracy, but also with respect to the reproduction of a given branch length variation. In a second example, we show how the K score allows the selection of orthologous genes by choosing those that better follow the overall shape of a given reference tree.

AVAILABILITY

http://molevol.ibmb.csic.es/Ktreedist.html

摘要

摘要

我们介绍了一种新的系统发育比较方法,该方法可测量两棵系统发育树在相对分支长度和拓扑结构上的总体差异。为此,该算法首先对其中一棵树进行缩放,使其全局分歧尽可能与另一棵树相似。然后,将同时考虑拓扑结构和分支长度差异的分支长度距离应用于这两棵树。由此我们得到最小分支长度距离或K树得分。相对分支长度差异很大的两棵树会得到较高的K得分,而谱系间速率变化相似的两棵树则会得到较低的得分,无论两棵树的总体速率如何。K树得分有多种应用,这里详细解释其中两种。首先,该得分不仅可以评估系统发育算法在拓扑准确性方面的性能,还可以评估其在再现给定分支长度变化方面的性能。在第二个例子中,我们展示了K得分如何通过选择那些更符合给定参考树总体形状的基因来选择直系同源基因。

可用性

http://molevol.ibmb.csic.es/Ktreedist.html

相似文献

1
The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.K树得分:系统发育树相对分支长度和拓扑结构差异的量化。
Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2954-6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm466. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
2
A novel algorithm and web-based tool for comparing two alternative phylogenetic trees.一种用于比较两棵备选系统发育树的新型算法及基于网络的工具。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jan 1;22(1):117-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti720. Epub 2005 Oct 18.
3
Interactive visualization software for exploring phylogenetic trees and clades.用于探索系统发育树和进化枝的交互式可视化软件。
Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 15;24(6):868-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn038. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
4
CTree: comparison of clusters between phylogenetic trees made easy.CTree:轻松比较系统发育树之间的簇。
Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2952-3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm410. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
5
Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.评估 AFLP 数据集内进化分歧与系统发育准确性之间的关系。
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 May;27(5):988-1000. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp315. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
6
A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.部分基因组测序和限制性片段分析在系统发育关系重建中的准确性的计算机模拟分析
Infect Genet Evol. 2006 Jul;6(4):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2005.10.002. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
7
Phylogenetic trees: visualizing, customizing and detecting incongruence.系统发育树:可视化、定制与检测不一致性
Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 1;21(19):3801-2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti590. Epub 2005 Jul 19.
8
TreeSnatcher: coding trees from images.TreeSnatcher:从图像中编码树木信息。
Bioinformatics. 2007 Dec 15;23(24):3384-5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm438. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
9
SYMMETREE: whole-tree analysis of differential diversification rates.SYMMETREE:差异多样化率的全树分析
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):1709-10. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti175. Epub 2004 Nov 30.
10
STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence.STEM:在溯祖模型下使用最大似然法进行基因树物种树估计。
Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 1;25(7):971-3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp079. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Fitness Effect of the Isoniazid Resistance Mutation S315T of the Catalase-Peroxidase Enzyme KatG of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.结核分枝杆菌过氧化氢酶-过氧化物酶KatG的异烟肼耐药突变S315T的适应性效应
Genome Biol Evol. 2025 Jul 3;17(7). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaf120.
2
New generalized metric based on branch length distance to compare B cell lineage trees.基于分支长度距离的新广义度量用于比较B细胞谱系树。
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2024 Oct 5;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13015-024-00267-1.
3
The redescription and complete mitogenomes of two species (Hemiptera, Oxycarenidae) and phylogenetic implications.
两种物种(半翅目,尖翅蝽科)的重新描述及完整线粒体基因组分析及其系统发育意义
Zookeys. 2024 Sep 5;1211:231-250. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1211.126013. eCollection 2024.
4
Structural Phylogenetics with Protein Mass Spectrometry: A Proof-of-Concept.基于蛋白质质谱的结构系统发生学:概念验证。
Protein J. 2024 Oct;43(5):997-1008. doi: 10.1007/s10930-024-10227-8. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
5
Accurate Recapitulation of Chikungunya Virus Complete Coding Sequence Phylogeny Using Variable Genome Regions for Genomic Surveillance.利用可变基因组区域进行基因组监测,准确再现基孔肯雅病毒完整编码序列系统发育。
Viruses. 2024 Jun 7;16(6):926. doi: 10.3390/v16060926.
6
Phylogeny, taxonomy, and character evolution in subgenus .亚属中的系统发育、分类学及性状演化
Persoonia. 2022 Dec 20;49:136-170. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2022.49.04. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
7
Major distinctions between the two oligopeptide permease systems of with respect to signaling, development and evolutionary divergence.两种寡肽透酶系统在信号转导、发育和进化分歧方面的主要区别。
Microbiology (Reading). 2023 Sep;169(9). doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001382.
8
The Free Lunch is not over yet-systematic exploration of numerical thresholds in maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference.免费午餐尚未结束——最大似然系统发育推断中数值阈值的系统探索
Bioinform Adv. 2023 Sep 14;3(1):vbad124. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad124. eCollection 2023.
9
Evolutionary Rates, Divergence Rates, and Performance of Individual Mitochondrial Genes Based on Phylogenetic Analysis of Copepoda.基于桡足类系统发育分析的进化率、分歧率和单个线粒体基因的表现。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;14(7):1496. doi: 10.3390/genes14071496.
10
Identifying and addressing methodological incongruence in phylogenomics: A review.识别和解决系统发育基因组学中的方法学不一致性:综述
Evol Appl. 2023 Jun 6;16(6):1087-1104. doi: 10.1111/eva.13565. eCollection 2023 Jun.