Gharabaghi B, Singh M K, Inkratas C, Fleming I R, McBean E
School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Waste Manag. 2008;28(9):1509-17. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
The implementation of landfill gas to energy (LFGTE) projects has greatly assisted in reducing the greenhouse gases and air pollutants, leading to an improved local air quality and reduced health risks. The majority of cities in developing countries still dispose of their municipal waste in uncontrolled 'open dumps.' Municipal solid waste landfill construction practices and operating procedures in these countries pose a challenge to implementation of LFGTE projects because of concern about damage to the gas collection infrastructure (horizontal headers and vertical wells) caused by minor, relatively shallow slumps and slides within the waste mass. While major slope failures can and have occurred, such failures in most cases have been shown to involve contributory factors or triggers such as high pore pressures, weak foundation soil or failure along weak geosynthetic interfaces. Many researchers who have studied waste mechanics propose that the shear strength of municipal waste is sufficient such that major deep-seated catastrophic failures under most circumstances require such contributory factors. Obviously, evaluation of such potential major failures requires expert analysis by geotechnical specialists with detailed site-specific information regarding foundation soils, interface shearing resistances and pore pressures both within the waste and in clayey barrier layers or foundation soils. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the potential use of very simple stability analyses which can be used to study the potential for slumps and slides within the waste mass and which may represent a significant constraint on construction and development of the landfill, on reclamation and closure and on the feasibility of a LFGTE project. The stability analyses rely on site-specific but simple estimates of the unit weight of waste and the pore pressure conditions and use "generic" published shear strength envelopes for municipal waste. Application of the slope stability analysis method is presented in a case study of two Brazilian landfill sites; the Cruz das Almas Landfill in Maceio and the Muribeca Landfill in Recife. The Muribeca site has never recorded a slope failure and is much larger and better-maintained when compared to the Maceio site at which numerous minor slumps and slides have been observed. Conventional limit-equilibrium analysis was used to calculate factors of safety for stability of the landfill side slopes. Results indicate that the Muribeca site is more stable with computed factors of safety values in the range 1.6-2.4 compared with computed values ranging from 0.9 to 1.4 for the Maceio site at which slope failures have been known to occur. The results suggest that this approach may be useful as a screening-level tool when considering the feasibility of implementing LFGTE projects.
垃圾填埋气发电(LFGTE)项目的实施极大地有助于减少温室气体和空气污染物,从而改善当地空气质量并降低健康风险。发展中国家的大多数城市仍在无控制的“露天垃圾场”处置城市垃圾。由于担心垃圾体内部相对较浅的小规模坍塌和滑坡会损坏气体收集基础设施(水平集气管和垂直井),这些国家的城市固体垃圾填埋场建设实践和操作程序给LFGTE项目的实施带来了挑战。虽然重大边坡失稳能够且已经发生,但在大多数情况下,此类失稳已表明涉及诸如高孔隙压力、软弱地基土或沿软弱土工合成材料界面的破坏等促成因素或触发因素。许多研究垃圾力学的学者提出,城市垃圾的抗剪强度足够高,以至于在大多数情况下,重大的深层灾难性破坏需要此类促成因素。显然,评估此类潜在的重大破坏需要岩土工程专家进行专业分析,并提供有关地基土、界面抗剪强度以及垃圾内部和粘性防渗层或地基土中的孔隙压力的详细特定场地信息。本文的目的是评估非常简单的稳定性分析的潜在用途,该分析可用于研究垃圾体内部坍塌和滑坡的可能性,而这可能对垃圾填埋场的建设与开发、复垦与封场以及LFGTE项目的可行性构成重大限制。稳定性分析依赖于对垃圾单位重量和孔隙压力条件的特定场地但简单的估计,并使用已发表的城市垃圾“通用”抗剪强度包络线。在巴西两个垃圾填埋场的案例研究中展示了边坡稳定性分析方法的应用;马塞约的克鲁斯达斯阿尔马斯垃圾填埋场和累西腓的穆里贝卡垃圾填埋场。与马塞约垃圾填埋场相比,穆里贝卡垃圾填埋场从未发生过边坡失稳,规模更大且维护得更好,在马塞约垃圾填埋场已观察到多次小规模坍塌和滑坡。采用传统的极限平衡分析来计算垃圾填埋场边坡稳定性的安全系数。结果表明,穆里贝卡垃圾填埋场更稳定,计算得到的安全系数值在1.6 - 2.4范围内,而已知发生过边坡失稳的马塞约垃圾填埋场的计算值在0.9至1.4范围内。结果表明,在考虑实施LFGTE项目的可行性时,这种方法可能作为一种筛选级工具很有用。