• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死患者中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架对比的随机试验的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kastrati Adnan, Dibra Alban, Spaulding Christian, Laarman Gerrit J, Menichelli Maurizio, Valgimigli Marco, Di Lorenzo Emilio, Kaiser Christoph, Tierala Ilkka, Mehilli Julinda, Seyfarth Melchior, Varenne Olivier, Dirksen Maurits T, Percoco Gianfranco, Varricchio Attilio, Pittl Undine, Syvänne Mikko, Suttorp Maarten J, Violini Roberto, Schömig Albert

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Lazarettstr.36, Munich 80636, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2007 Nov;28(22):2706-13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm402. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm402
PMID:17901079
Abstract

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a meta-analysis of eight randomized trials comparing drug-eluting stents (sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents) with bare-metal stents in 2786 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. All patients were followed up for a mean of 12.0-24.2 months. Individual data were available for seven trials with 2476 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the need for reintervention (target lesion revascularization). The primary safety endpoint was stent thrombosis. Other outcomes of interest were death and recurrent myocardial infarction. Drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the risk of reintervention, hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.29-0.50), P < 0.001. The overall risk of stent thrombosis: hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.46-1.39), P = 0.43; death: hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.53-1.10), P = 0.14; and recurrent myocardial infarction: hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.48-1.08, P = 0.11) was not significantly different for patients receiving drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents.

CONCLUSION

The use of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is safe and improves clinical outcomes by reducing the risk of reintervention compared with bare-metal stents.

摘要

目的

比较药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法与结果

我们对八项随机试验进行了荟萃分析,比较了药物洗脱支架(西罗莫司洗脱支架或紫杉醇洗脱支架)与裸金属支架在2786例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用。所有患者平均随访12.0 - 24.2个月。七项试验的2476例患者有个体数据。主要疗效终点是再次干预的必要性(靶病变血运重建)。主要安全终点是支架血栓形成。其他感兴趣的结局是死亡和复发性心肌梗死。药物洗脱支架显著降低了再次干预的风险,风险比为0.38(95%可信区间,0.29 - 0.50),P < 0.001。支架血栓形成的总体风险:风险比为0.80(95%可信区间,0.46 - 1.39),P = 0.43;死亡:风险比为0.76(95%可信区间,0.53 - 1.10),P = 0.14;复发性心肌梗死:风险比为0.72(95%可信区间,0.48 - 1.08),P = 0.11,接受药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的患者之间无显著差异。

结论

在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中使用药物洗脱支架是安全的,与裸金属支架相比,通过降低再次干预的风险改善了临床结局。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架对比的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2007 Nov;28(22):2706-13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm402. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
2
Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(5):516-24.
3
Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials.比较新一代药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:EXAMINATION(急性心肌梗死中评价 Xience-V 支架的临床研究)和 COMFORTABLE-AMI(急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中生物可降解涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
5-year follow-up after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a follow-up study of the PASSION (Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus Conventional Stent in Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation) trial.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行紫杉醇洗脱支架与金属裸支架初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年随访:PASSION(紫杉醇洗脱支架与心肌梗死 ST 段抬高患者常规支架比较)试验的随访研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.003.
5
Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1946-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810116.
6
Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.应用 SYNTAX 评分预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年临床结局:STRATEGY(单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死)和 MULTISTRATEGY(多中心评价单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗联合西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死研究)试验的一项亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.017.
7
Long-Term outcome of drug-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent in Primary Angioplasty (PASEO) Randomized Trial.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死的长期疗效比较:紫杉醇或西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PASEO)随机试验中的结果
Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11):964-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.830372. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
8
Outcomes following coronary stenting in the era of bare-metal vs the era of drug-eluting stents.裸金属支架时代与药物洗脱支架时代冠状动脉支架置入后的结局
JAMA. 2008 Jun 25;299(24):2868-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.24.2868.
9
Drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction: updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.急性心肌梗死中的药物洗脱支架:随机试验的更新荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Jun;99(6):345-57. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0133-y. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
10
The EXAMINATION trial (Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction): 2-year results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.EXAMINATION 试验(依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的比较):一项多中心随机对照临床试验的 2 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in 2024.2024 年 CVIT 专家共识文件:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):335-375. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01036-y. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Long-term safety of ultrathin bioabsorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin durable-polymer drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物药物洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的长期安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1465-1473. doi: 10.1002/clc.24139. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
3
Declining risk of heart failure hospitalization following first acute myocardial infarction in Scotland between 1991-2016.
1991 年至 2016 年期间,苏格兰首次急性心肌梗死患者心力衰竭住院风险降低。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;25(8):1213-1224. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2965. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
Gender disparities in prevalence by diagnostic criteria, treatment and mortality of newly diagnosed acute myocardial infarction in Korean adults.韩国成年人新诊断急性心肌梗死的诊断标准、治疗和死亡率的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 13;13(1):4120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31014-y.
5
The importance of randomization in clinical research.随机化在临床研究中的重要性。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Sep;38(5):562-565. doi: 10.1007/s12055-022-01401-7. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
6
Risk of Heart Failure in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and Undefined Duration of Antiplatelets.接受药物洗脱支架植入且抗血小板治疗持续时间不明确的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者发生心力衰竭的风险
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 28;12(3):369. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030369.
7
CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) update 2022.CVIT 专家共识文件:急性心肌梗死(AMI)直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)更新 2022 版
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jan;37(1):1-34. doi: 10.1007/s12928-021-00829-9. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Prognostic Analysis of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Implantation of Different Stents for the First Time.首次接受不同支架植入的急性心肌梗死患者的预后分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 29;10(21):5093. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215093.
9
Current Therapeutic Approach to Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Congenital Hemophilia.先天性血友病患者急性心肌梗死的当前治疗方法
Life (Basel). 2021 Oct 11;11(10):1072. doi: 10.3390/life11101072.
10
2021 Korean Society of Myocardial Infarction Expert Consensus Document on Revascularization for Acute Myocardial Infarction.2021年韩国心肌梗死学会急性心肌梗死血运重建专家共识文件
Korean Circ J. 2021 Apr;51(4):289-307. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0043.