Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者的冠状动脉疾病筛查

Screening for coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes.

作者信息

Bax Jeroen J, Young Lawrence H, Frye Robert L, Bonow Robert O, Steinberg Helmut O, Barrett Eugene J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2729-36. doi: 10.2337/dc07-9927.

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) accounts for a large fraction of the morbidity, mortality, and cost of diabetes. Recognizing this, nearly 10 years ago the American Diabetes Association published a consensus recommendation that clinicians consider a risk factor-guided screening approach to early diagnosis of CAD in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Subsequent clinical trial results have not supported those recommendations. Since the prior consensus statement, newer imaging methods, such as coronary artery calcium scoring and noninvasive angiography with computed tomography (CT) techniques, have come into use. These technologies, which allow quantitation of atherosclerotic burden and can predict risk of cardiac events, might provide an approach to more widespread coronary atherosclerosis screening. However, over this same time interval, there has been recognition of diabetes as a cardiovascular disease (CVD) equivalent, clear demonstration that medical interventions should provide primary and secondary CVD risk reduction in diabetic populations, and suggestive evidence that percutaneous coronary revascularization may not provide additive survival benefit to intensive medical management in patients with stable CAD. This additional evidence raises the question of whether documenting asymptomatic atherosclerosis or ischemia in people with diabetes is warranted. More data addressing this issue will be forthcoming from the BARI 2-D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes) trial. Until then, for patients with type 2 diabetes who are asymptomatic for CAD, we recommend that testing for atherosclerosis or ischemia, perhaps with cardiac CT as the initial test, be reserved for those in whom medical treatment goals cannot be met and for selected individuals in whom there is strong clinical suspicion of very-high-risk CAD. Better approaches to identify such individuals based on readily obtained clinical variables are sorely needed.

摘要

冠状动脉疾病(CAD)在糖尿病的发病率、死亡率及医疗花费中占很大比例。认识到这一点后,近10年前美国糖尿病协会发布了一项共识建议,即临床医生应采用风险因素导向的筛查方法,对有症状和无症状患者进行CAD的早期诊断。随后的临床试验结果并不支持这些建议。自上次共识声明发布以来,一些更新的成像方法,如冠状动脉钙化评分以及采用计算机断层扫描(CT)技术的无创血管造影,已开始应用。这些技术能够对动脉粥样硬化负荷进行定量分析,并可预测心脏事件风险,可能为更广泛的冠状动脉粥样硬化筛查提供一种方法。然而,在同一时期,糖尿病被视为等同于心血管疾病(CVD),有明确证据表明医疗干预应在糖尿病患者群体中降低原发性和继发性CVD风险,还有提示性证据表明,对于稳定型CAD患者,经皮冠状动脉血运重建术可能不会比强化药物治疗带来额外的生存获益。这些额外的证据引发了一个问题,即对糖尿病患者进行无症状动脉粥样硬化或缺血的检查是否必要。关于这个问题的更多数据将来自BARI 2-D(糖尿病患者旁路血管成形术血运重建研究2)试验。在此之前,对于无症状CAD的2型糖尿病患者,我们建议,对于那些无法实现治疗目标的患者以及临床高度怀疑为极高风险CAD的特定个体,或许可以将心脏CT作为初始检查手段,进行动脉粥样硬化或缺血检测。目前迫切需要基于容易获得的临床变量来更好地识别这类个体的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验