Spong Catherine Y, Landon Mark B, Gilbert Sharon, Rouse Dwight J, Leveno Kenneth J, Varner Michael W, Moawad Atef H, Simhan Hyagriv N, Harper Margaret, Wapner Ronald J, Sorokin Yoram, Miodovnik Menachem, Carpenter Marshall, Peaceman Alan M, O'Sullivan Mary J, Sibai Baha M, Langer Oded, Thorp John M, Ramin Susan M, Mercer Brian M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):801-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2.
Current information on the risk of uterine rupture after cesarean delivery has generally compared the risk after trial of labor to that occurring with an elective cesarean delivery without labor. Because antepartum counseling cannot account for whether a woman will develop an indication requiring a repeat cesarean delivery or whether labor will occur before scheduled cesarean delivery, the purpose of this analysis was to provide clinically useful information regarding the risks of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome for women at term with a history of prior cesarean delivery.
Women with a term singleton gestation and prior cesarean delivery were studied over 4 years at 19 centers. For this analysis, outcomes from five groups were studied: trial of labor, elective repeat with no labor, elective repeat with labor (women presenting in early labor who subsequently underwent cesarean delivery), indicated repeat with labor, and indicated repeat without labor. All cases of uterine rupture were reviewed centrally to assure accuracy of diagnosis.
A total of 39,117 women were studied. In term pregnant women with a prior cesarean delivery, the overall risk for uterine rupture was 0.32% (125 of 39,117), and the overall risk for serious adverse perinatal outcome (stillbirth, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal death) was 106 of 39,049 (0.27%). The uterine rupture risk for indicated repeat cesarean delivery (labor or without labor) was 7 of 6,080 (0.12%); the risk for elective (no indication) repeat cesarean delivery (labor or without labor) was 4 of 17,714 (0.02%). Indicated repeat cesarean delivery increased the risk of uterine rupture by a factor of 5 (odds ratio 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.49-17.44). In the absence of an indication, the presence of labor also increased the risk of uterine rupture (4 of 2,721 [0.15%] compared with 0 of 14,993, P<.01). The highest rate of uterine rupture occurred in women undergoing trial of labor (0.74%, 114 of 15,323).
At term, the risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome for women with a singleton and prior cesarean delivery is low regardless of mode of delivery, occurring in 3 per 1,000 women. Maternal complications occurred in 3-8% of women within the five delivery groups.
目前关于剖宫产术后子宫破裂风险的信息,通常是将试产与择期剖宫产(未经历分娩)后的风险进行比较。由于产前咨询无法考虑到女性是否会出现需要再次剖宫产的指征,或者分娩是否会在计划剖宫产之前发生,因此本分析的目的是为有剖宫产史的足月女性提供关于子宫破裂风险和不良围产期结局的临床有用信息。
在19个中心对有足月单胎妊娠和剖宫产史的女性进行了4年的研究。对于本分析,研究了五组的结局:试产、择期再次剖宫产(未分娩)、择期再次剖宫产(伴有分娩,即临产后行剖宫产的女性)、有指征再次剖宫产(伴有分娩)和有指征再次剖宫产(未分娩)。所有子宫破裂病例均进行集中审查,以确保诊断准确性。
共研究了39117名女性。有剖宫产史的足月孕妇中,子宫破裂的总体风险为0.32%(39117例中有125例),严重不良围产期结局(死产、缺氧缺血性脑病、新生儿死亡)的总体风险为39049例中的106例(0.27%)。有指征再次剖宫产(伴有或未伴有分娩)的子宫破裂风险为6080例中的7例(0.12%);择期(无指征)再次剖宫产(伴有或未伴有分娩)的风险为17714例中的4例(0.02%)。有指征再次剖宫产使子宫破裂风险增加了5倍(优势比5.1,95%置信区间1.49 - 17.44)。在无指征的情况下,分娩也会增加子宫破裂的风险(2721例中有4例[0.15%],而14993例中为0例,P <.01)。子宫破裂发生率最高的是试产女性(0.74%,15323例中有114例)。
足月时,单胎且有剖宫产史的女性,无论分娩方式如何,子宫破裂和不良围产期结局的风险都很低,每1000名女性中有3例发生。五个分娩组中3 - 8%的女性出现了母体并发症。