Abercromby Andrew F J, Amonette William E, Layne Charles S, McFarlin Brian K, Hinman Martha R, Paloski William H
Wyle Laboratories, Inc., Houston, TX 77058, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Oct;39(10):1794-800. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181238a0f.
Excessive, chronic whole-body vibration (WBV) has a number of negative side effects on the human body, including disorders of the skeletal, digestive, reproductive, visual, and vestibular systems. Whole-body vibration training (WBVT) is intentional exposure to WBV to increase leg muscle strength, bone mineral density, health-related quality of life, and decrease back pain. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate vibration exposure and biodynamic responses during typical WBVT regimens.
Healthy men and women (N = 16) were recruited to perform slow, unloaded squats during WBVT (30 Hz; 4 mm(p-p)), during which knee flexion angle (KA), mechanical impedance, head acceleration (Ha(rms)), and estimated vibration dose value (eVDV) were measured. WBVT was repeated using two forms of vibration: 1) vertical forces to both feet simultaneously (VV), and 2) upward forces to only one foot at a time (RV).
Mechanical impedance varied inversely with KA during RV (effect size, eta(p)(2): 0.668, P < 0.01) and VV (eta(p)(2): 0.533, P < 0.05). Ha(rms) varied with KA (eta(p)(2): 0.686, P < 0.01) and is greater during VV than during RV at all KA (P < 0.01). The effect of KA on Ha(rms) is different for RV and VV (eta(p)(2): 0.567, P < 0.05). The eVDV associated with typical RV and VV training regimens (30 Hz, 4 mm(p-p), 10 min.d(-1)) exceeds the recommended daily vibration exposure as defined by ISO 2631-1 (P < 0.01).
ISO standards indicate that 10 min.d(-1) WBVT is potentially harmful to the human body; the risk of adverse health effects may be lower during RV than VV and at half-squats rather than full-squats or upright stance. More research is needed to explore the long-term health hazards of WBVT.
过度、长期的全身振动(WBV)会对人体产生多种负面影响,包括骨骼、消化、生殖、视觉和前庭系统紊乱。全身振动训练(WBVT)是有意暴露于WBV以增加腿部肌肉力量、骨矿物质密度、与健康相关的生活质量,并减轻背痛。本研究的目的是定量评估典型WBVT方案中的振动暴露和生物动力学反应。
招募健康男性和女性(N = 16)在WBVT(30 Hz;4 mm(峰-峰))期间进行缓慢、无负重深蹲,在此期间测量膝关节屈曲角度(KA)、机械阻抗、头部加速度(Ha(均方根))和估计振动剂量值(eVDV)。使用两种振动形式重复WBVT:1)同时对双脚施加垂直力(VV),2)一次仅对一只脚施加向上力(RV)。
在RV(效应大小,eta(p)(2):0.668,P < 0.01)和VV(eta(p)(2):0.533,P < 0.05)期间,机械阻抗与KA呈反比变化。Ha(均方根)随KA变化(eta(p)(2):0.686,P < 0.01),并且在所有KA时,VV期间的Ha(均方根)均大于RV期间(P < 0.01)。KA对Ha(均方根)的影响在RV和VV中有所不同(eta(p)(2):0.567,P < 0.05)。与典型的RV和VV训练方案(30 Hz,4 mm(峰-峰),10 min·d(-1))相关的eVDV超过了ISO 2631-1定义的推荐每日振动暴露量(P < 0.01)。
ISO标准表明,每天10分钟的WBVT可能对人体有害;与VV相比,RV期间以及半蹲而非全蹲或直立姿势时,对健康产生不良影响的风险可能更低。需要更多研究来探索WBVT的长期健康危害。