Suppr超能文献

抗癫痫药物和癫痫发作对未成熟大脑的神经发育影响。

Neurodevelopmental impact of antiepileptic drugs and seizures in the immature brain.

作者信息

Kim Jin-Sook, Kondratyev Alexei, Tomita York, Gale Karen

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience & Department of Pharmacology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2007;48 Suppl 5:19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01285.x.

Abstract

Seizure incidence during the neonatal period is higher than any other period in the lifespan, yet we know little about this period in terms of the effect of seizures or of the drugs used in their treatment. The fact that several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) induce pronounced apoptotic neuronal death in specific regions of the immature brain prompts a search for AEDs that may be devoid of this action. Furthermore, there is a clear need to find out if a history of seizures alters the proapoptotic action of the AEDs. Our studies are aimed at both of these issues. Phenytoin, valproate, phenobarbital, and MK801 each induced substantial regionally specific cell death, whereas levetiracetam even in high doses (up to 1,500 mg/kg) did not have this action. In view of our previously findings of neuroprotective actions of repeated seizures in the adult brain, we also examined repeated seizures for a possible antiapoptotic action in the infant rat. Rat pups were preexposed to electroshock seizures (ECS) for 3 days (age 5-7 days) before receiving MK801 on day 7. The effect of ECS, which was consistently a 30% decrease in MK801-induced programmed cell death (PCD), suggests that repeated seizures can exert an antiapoptotic action in the infant brain. In contrast, PCD induced by valproate was not attenuated by ECS preexposure, suggesting that valproate-induced PCD is mechanistically distinct from that induced by MK801 and may not be activity-dependent. Presently, we do not know if this neuroprotective effect of seizures is deleterious or beneficial. If the seizures also enhance the survival of neurons that are destined to undergo naturally occurring PCD, early childhood seizures may have deleterious effects by preventing this necessary component of normal development. While this effect of seizures might be counteracted by AEDs, the fact that several AEDs shift the PCD to the other extreme, and trigger excessive neuronal cell loss, raises concern about whether the drug therapy may be more detrimental than the seizures. In this context, it is encouraging that we have identified at least one AED that is devoid of a proapoptotic action in the infant brain, even in high doses. It is now important to evaluate the long-term consequences of the changes in PCD in infancy by examining behavioral outcomes and seizure susceptibility in the AED- and seizure-exposed neonates when they reach adulthood.

摘要

新生儿期癫痫发作的发生率高于生命中的任何其他时期,但就癫痫发作的影响或用于治疗的药物而言,我们对这一时期了解甚少。几种抗癫痫药物(AEDs)在未成熟脑的特定区域诱导明显的凋亡性神经元死亡,这一事实促使人们寻找可能没有这种作用的AEDs。此外,明确需要查明癫痫发作史是否会改变AEDs的促凋亡作用。我们的研究针对这两个问题。苯妥英、丙戊酸、苯巴比妥和MK801均诱导了显著的区域特异性细胞死亡,而左乙拉西坦即使高剂量(高达1500mg/kg)也没有这种作用。鉴于我们之前发现成年脑中反复癫痫发作具有神经保护作用,我们还研究了反复癫痫发作对幼鼠是否可能具有抗凋亡作用。在第7天给予MK801之前,将幼鼠预先暴露于电击惊厥(ECS)3天(5-7日龄)。ECS的作用始终是使MK801诱导的程序性细胞死亡(PCD)减少30%,这表明反复癫痫发作可在幼鼠脑中发挥抗凋亡作用。相比之下,丙戊酸诱导的PCD并未因预先暴露于ECS而减弱,这表明丙戊酸诱导的PCD在机制上与MK801诱导的不同,可能与活性无关。目前,我们尚不知道癫痫发作的这种神经保护作用是有害还是有益。如果癫痫发作还能提高注定要经历自然发生的PCD的神经元的存活率,那么幼儿期癫痫发作可能通过阻止正常发育的这一必要组成部分而产生有害影响。虽然癫痫发作的这种影响可能会被AEDs抵消,但几种AEDs将PCD转移到另一个极端并引发过度神经元细胞丢失这一事实,引发了人们对药物治疗是否可能比癫痫发作更有害的担忧。在这种情况下,令人鼓舞的是,我们已经确定至少有一种AED在幼鼠脑中即使高剂量也没有促凋亡作用。现在重要的是,通过检查暴露于AEDs和癫痫发作的新生儿成年后的行为结果和癫痫易感性,来评估婴儿期PCD变化的长期后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验