Boni Julia Elisabeth, Brickl Rolf Stefan, Dressman Jennifer
Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;59(10):1375-82. doi: 10.1211/jpp.59.10.0007.
The objectives of this study were to compare two methods for the preparation of bicarbonate buffer, and to compare media prepared with bicarbonate buffer with commonly used biorelevant and pharmacopoeial media in terms of their suitability for dissolution testing. The various media were compared with regard to ease of preparation, robustness and reproducibility of composition. The dissolution of three formulations of a typical Biopharmaceutical Classification System Class II drug (BIXX) was compared in bicarbonate buffer, standard phosphate buffer, a biorelevant buffer (fasted-state simulating intestinal fluid, FaSSIF) and a modified FaSSIF prepared with bicarbonate buffer. The bicarbonate buffer used for dissolution testing was produced by supplying carbon dioxide to a saline solution (0.9% NaCl, to which 12 or 42 mmol NaOH had been added). The bicarbonate buffer had to be prepared in-situ, which proved to be time-consuming, and the pH stability of the bicarbonate buffer could only be maintained under constant CO2 supply. To minimize the mechanical stress caused by inflow and evaporation of gas, the carbon dioxide was supplied above the medium during the dissolution test. Despite taking these measures, use of bicarbonate buffer led to less reproducible dissolution results than the phosphate buffers commonly used to prepare compendial media and FaSSIF, with coefficient of variance values 1.5- to 5-times higher in bicarbonate buffer. It was concluded that although a bicarbonate buffer system would be physiologically relevant for the fasted state in the small intestine, its suitability for dissolution testing is restricted by lack of practicability and poor reproducibility of results.
本研究的目的是比较两种制备碳酸氢盐缓冲液的方法,并比较用碳酸氢盐缓冲液制备的介质与常用的生物相关介质和药典介质在溶出度测试适用性方面的差异。比较了各种介质在制备简易性、组成的稳健性和重现性方面的差异。在碳酸氢盐缓冲液、标准磷酸盐缓冲液、一种生物相关缓冲液(空腹状态模拟肠液,FaSSIF)以及用碳酸氢盐缓冲液制备的改良FaSSIF中,比较了一种典型的生物药剂学分类系统II类药物(BIXX)三种制剂的溶出情况。用于溶出度测试的碳酸氢盐缓冲液是通过向盐溶液(0.9% NaCl,已添加12或42 mmol NaOH)中通入二氧化碳来制备的。碳酸氢盐缓冲液必须原位制备,这被证明很耗时,并且碳酸氢盐缓冲液的pH稳定性只能在持续供应二氧化碳的情况下维持。为了使气体流入和蒸发引起的机械应力最小化,在溶出度测试期间,二氧化碳在介质上方供应。尽管采取了这些措施,但与常用于制备药典介质和FaSSIF的磷酸盐缓冲液相比,使用碳酸氢盐缓冲液导致的溶出结果重现性较差,碳酸氢盐缓冲液的变异系数值高出1.5至5倍。得出的结论是,尽管碳酸氢盐缓冲液系统在生理上与小肠的空腹状态相关,但其在溶出度测试中的适用性受到实用性不足和结果重现性差的限制。