Gonfiotti Alessandro, Davini Federico, Vaggelli Luca, De Francisci Agostino, Caldarella Adele, Gigli Paolo Maria, Janni Alberto
Thoracic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Dec;32(6):843-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
Our aim was to evaluate the best intrathoracoscopic localization technique between hookwire and radio-guided surgery, in patients with pulmonary nodule.
From January 2000 to January 2005 we enrolled in this study 50 patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule, prospective randomized in two groups, well matched for diameter and depth of the pulmonary lesion. In 25 patients we performed the hookwire technique (Group A), whereas in the other 25 patients radio-guided localization was adopted (Group B). In both groups the localization technique was compared with finger palpation. In Group A, 9 lesions were in the left and 16 in the right lung; in Group B, 14 nodules were in the left lung and 11 in the right one. In both groups, the distance of the nodule from the pleural surface with lung inflated was 2.5 cm (1.5-2.5 cm in 12 patients, and >2.5 cm for the remaining 13). The mean size of the nodules in both groups was 1.1, range 0.6-1.9 (<or=1 cm n=18 patients, and >1 cm n=7 patients).
All patients underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection, and 23 patients with a primary pulmonary lesion underwent thoracotomy for lobectomy and radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. In Group A the hookwire technique localized the nodule in 21 of 25 patients (84%) whereas finger palpation localized it in 7 of 25 patients (28%). In Group B, radio-guided surgery localized the nodule in 24 of 25 patients (96%) whereas finger palpation localized it in 6 of 25 (24%). In Group A we registered 6 cases of pneumothorax compared to 1 case observed in the radio-guided group. Postoperative hospital stay required an average of 4 days in both groups.
In our experience radio-guided surgery has therefore been proven efficacious in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery allows the removal of pulmonary nodules without complications. Hookwire was also shown to be efficacious but demonstrated complications linked primarily to external technical factors.
我们的目的是评估在肺结节患者中,钩丝定位技术和放射性引导手术这两种胸腔镜定位技术中哪一种最佳。
从2000年1月至2005年1月,我们纳入了50例孤立性肺结节患者,前瞻性随机分为两组,两组患者肺部病变的直径和深度匹配良好。25例患者采用钩丝技术(A组),另外25例患者采用放射性引导定位(B组)。两组均将定位技术与手指触诊进行比较。A组中,9个病变位于左肺,16个位于右肺;B组中,14个结节位于左肺,11个位于右肺。两组中,肺膨胀时结节距胸膜表面的距离均为2.5 cm(12例患者为1.5 - 2.5 cm,其余13例患者>2.5 cm)。两组结节的平均大小均为1.1,范围为0.6 - 1.9(≤1 cm的患者有18例,>1 cm的患者有7例)。
所有患者均接受了胸腔镜楔形切除术,23例原发性肺部病变患者接受了开胸肺叶切除术和根治性纵隔淋巴结清扫术。A组中,钩丝技术在25例患者中的21例(84%)成功定位了结节,而手指触诊在25例患者中的7例(28%)成功定位。B组中,放射性引导手术在25例患者中的24例(96%)成功定位了结节,而手指触诊在25例患者中的6例(24%)成功定位。A组记录到6例气胸,而放射性引导组观察到1例。两组术后平均住院时间均为4天。
根据我们的经验,放射性引导手术在孤立性肺结节的诊断中已被证明有效,电视辅助胸腔镜手术能够在无并发症的情况下切除肺结节。钩丝技术也被证明是有效的,但显示出的并发症主要与外部技术因素有关。